.

.
marylin monroe
Showing posts with label lipid metabolism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lipid metabolism. Show all posts

L-Carnitine Works! Yet, Maybe More Subtly Than Thought: 1.2-5g L-Carnitine Increase Expression of Genes Implicated in Fatty Acid Oxidation, Glucose & Lipid Metabolism.

Image 1: This is you... well, not exactly. It's rather an animal model of human carnitine metabolis ;-)
As a faithful student of the SuppVersity it stands out of question that you have read my masterpiece *rofl* on the "Purported Ergogenics" in the "Amino Acids for Super Humans Series". You will thusly be familiar with the inconsistency of the mostly disappointing results of randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Whether it was for fat-loss, for increases in exercise performance or whatever else the producers of respective supplements promise would happen, when you buy and take their oftentimes profoundly underdosed supplements, in the absence of pathological (or severe dietary) carnitine deficiency the observed effects, if there were any, were negligible.

A soon to be published paper by Janin Keller and other researchers from the Institute of Animal Nutrition and Nutrition Psychology at the Justus-Liebig-University, in Gießen, the Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences at the Martin-Luther-University, in Halle-Wittenberg, and the Hans-Knöll-Institute, Research Group Systems Biology/Bioinformatic, in Jena (all in Germany, btw.), does now shed some light onto the more subtle, epigenetic effects of l-carnitine supplementation (Keller. 2011).
Image 2: The calculation of human equivalent doses is a constant (unreliable) pain in my ass - either you don't have the adequate conversion ratio or you do not know how much an animal eats. weighs etc...
Note: While my calculation (see below) indicates that the equivalent dose of the dietary enrichment used in the study should be ~4-5g, Keller et al. use a different method to calculate dose equivalents that is based on the ~500g of feed the pigs consumed per day. According to their calculation the daily dose of l-carnitine on a per kg body weight base for the piglets (final body weight: 17kg) was 15mg/kg body weight l-carnitine. If we now take a look at our conversion table (cf. table 1), where this specific type of big obviously is not listed, we probably have to divide that by 1.1 to get the Human Equivalent Dose - but since this is for "Mini pigs", we will just leave it with 15mg/kg and would thus have a dose of only 1.2g for an 80kg human being.
Keller et al. fed a group of 16 male crossbred pigs (body weight at study begin: ~10kg) a standardized diet with a naturally occurring amount of <5mg/kg carnitine. Half of the pigs, did receive additional 500mg/kg carnitine in their feed. In view of the fact that this effectively centuplicated (x100) the carnitine content of the diet, and considering the fact that the average human dietary carnitine intake ranges from ~47mg in men to ~30mg in women (Lennon. 1986), this would translate into an additional dose of roughly 4-5g of supplemental l-carnitine per day for humans. If you buy your carnitine in bulk (currently ~5$ per 100g) mimicking the supplement regimen used in the study would cost you about 25cents a day... but I guess before you do that you will rightly want to know what the potential benefits would be.
Figure 1: Liver free and total l-carnitine levels (in nmol/g) in growing piglets after 21-days of normal or carnitine supplemented feed (data adapted from Keller. 2011)
As you can see in figure 1 the liver of the animals literally squirreled the l-carnitine away (this could also be the reason, why most of the previously cited studies saw only transient increases in serum l-carnitine levels and almost no increases in muscular carnitine stores). An increase of +915% in free and +937% in total liver l-carnitine content is - I probably don't have to mention that - more than significant and was not without consequences... consequences of which scientists probably would not have even thought about 10 or even 20 years ago - epigenetic changes of which Keller et al. write:
we observed that 563 genes were differentially expressed by L-carnitine. This shows that supplemental L-carnitine influences gene expression in the liver of piglets and indicates that at least some of the biological effects of L-carnitine are mediated by altering gene transcription. [...] Gene term enrichment analysis revealed that the most frequent biological processes associated with L- carnitine supplementation were dealing with metabolic processes. This was not surprising considering that the main function of L-carnitine is to stimulate energy metabolism by acting as shuttling molecule for long-chain fatty acids which also enhances the metabolic flux of glucose through the glycolytic chain. This was also confirmed by clustering analysis showing that 6 out of the 10 top-ranked clusters were dealing with metabolic processes. Representative genes from one of these clusters dealing with metabolic processes (carboxylic acid metabolic process, oxoacid metabolic process, organic acid metabolic process) encoded proteins or enzymes involved in cellular fatty acid uptake (SLC27A6, solute carrier family 27/fatty acid transporter, member 6), fatty acid activation (ACSL3, Long-chain-fatty-acid-CoA ligase 3) and fatty acid β-oxidation (ACADSB, Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, short/branched chain specific), and most of these genes including SLC27A6, ACSL3 and ACADSB were found to be significantly up-regulated by L-carnitine supplementation.
Moreover, the researchers found that a whole host of genes (e.g. GLUT8, GCK and GPD1 more than 4x elevated) related to glucose metabolism (glucose transport, conversion of glucose into glucose 6-phosphate, and glycolysis, and hexose biosynthetic processes, like gluconeogenesis) and triglyceride metabolic and triglyceride biosynthetic processes were elevated, as well. Taken together this lead the scientists to conclude that the epigenetic changes that were induced by 21 days of (relatively) high-dose dietary l-carnitine supplementation suggest that the "conditionally essential" amino acid l-carnitine
  1. ... exerts its "well-known stimulatory effect [...] on fatty acid β-oxidation" at least partly by stimulating the transcription of genes involved in "cellular fatty acid uptake, fatty acid activation and β-oxidation"
  2. ... has profound beneficial effects on glucose metabolism and utilization, which are mediated "not only by [a genetically triggered] stimulation of glycolysis but also suppression of gluconeogenesis in the liver", and
  3. ... triggers genetic modifications which lead to an "inhibition of glycerolipid biosynthesis and stimulation of lipoprotein secretion and fatty acid catabolism", which contribute to its overall beneficial effects on lipid metabolism.
Now that you have all the facts, I'll leave it up to you to decide whether those "hidden" genetic changes are worth the 0.25$ (or 0.06$ if you use the 1.2g dose, cf. red box above) you would have to pay for your share of supplemental l-carnitine per day... and by the way: don't ask me if whatever other form of carnitine will do just as well, better or worse. This is a question only a separate study could answer!

    Men Are Different, Women, Too - Also, When it Comes to the Metabolic Effects of Exercise | Plus: Differences Make Female 2h Cardio Sessions Look Even More Futile

    Men are fat burning machines, women are not!? Review of sex-differences in fatty acid oxidation during and after exercise puts yet another "!" behind the "don't spend 2h on the treadmill if your goal is fat loss"-primacy for women.
    We all know: Exercise training is generally a healthful activity and an effective intervention for reducing the risk of numerous chronic diseases including cardiovascular disease and diabetes. And as Gregory Henderson points out, both a result of prevention of weight gain over time as well as direct effects of exercise on metabolism of lipids and the other macronutrient classes during and after exercise.

    Unfortunately, the contemporary evidence indicates that resting metabolism does not respond similarly in all individuals to exercise participation. One of the factors that determine the effects of exercise on resting energy expenditure (and even intake) is sex,... no not, sex as in sexual intercourse, but sex as in "men vs. women"!
    Learn more about building muscle at www.suppversity.com

    Tri-Set or Multi-Set for Max. Fat Loss?

    Alternating Squat & Blood Pressure - Productive?

    Pre-Exhaustion Exhausts Your Growth Potential

    Full ROM ➯ Full Gains - Form Counts!

    Battle the Rope to Get Ripped & Strong

    Cut the Volume Make the Gains!
    In his recent paper in Frontiers in Endocrinology, Gegory C. Henderson reviews the differences in the effects of exercise on resting metabolic rate, fuel selection after exercise, as well as the shuttling of triglyceride and fatty acids between tissues in men and women.
    Figure 1. Summary of the main results of Henderson's review of the differential effects of exercise on lipid metabolism in men (M) and women (F) - from an excellent review (Henderson. 2014)
    Henderson summarizes his results the awesome figure above. And this is how you read it. Follow the links between "prior exercise" at the heart of the figure and read the "M = F"s, "M > F"s and so on, which tell you that...
    • exercise will have a greater lipolytic effect on the fat cells of male vs. female bodies; since the amount of fat that's release into the blood correlates with the increase in fatty acid oxidation (caffeine "burns fat" this way), it's no wonder that...
    • exercise will have a more significant effect on resting fuel oxidation (here mostly the oxidation of fat) in men than women, and...
    • exercise will have a greater inhibitory effect on the plasma triglyceride response to food in men than in does in women
    What we don't know yet, is whether there is a difference between the effects of exercise (in this case mostly aerobic) on the secretion of the heat-unhealthy VLDL cholesterol molecules from the liver.
    Is there something you can do about it, ladies? Yes, there is! Hit the weights, or hiit it hard. High intensity interval training, for example, has been shown to increase the capacity for fatty acid oxidation in 8 healthy, recreationally active women by 100% in the first 30 min and still +20% during the last 30 minutes of a 60 min endurance training session within just 2 weeks (Talanian. 2007).
    I know ladies, it may really look like we had an unfair advantage, but as long as you've got enough estrogen in your blood you are actually more resistant to body fat gains than we are. 
    Figure 2: Relative weight gain during 12 weeks of overfeeding in male vs. female vs. ovariectomized mice (Grove. 2010)
    Ok, we are talking about rodent data (see Figure 1), but based on evidence from human data, women have another "unfair" advantage. They accumulate more healthy (subcutaneous) and less unhealthy (visceral) fat than men (Shi. 2009). Fat that they are having a significantly harder time to shed (Ballor. 1991, specifically if they are trying to do it with the "typically female" hours "two hours on the treadmill"-approach to fat loss (Donnelly. 2005).
    Never work out only to burn fat.
    Bottom line: In view of the "fat exercise disadvantage" of women it appears even more hilarious that they are the ones who usually try to shed the (healthy) fat on their thighs and buttocks during endless cardio sessions. Sessions that are significantly less productive for them, than they'd be for their significant other.

    A fact that reminds me to remind you, girls, to take another look at the "The Fallacy of Working Out To "Burn Calories" + Exercise Shuts Down the Carb Cravings: Bench Press, Leg Press HIIT & LISS Are Not Meant to Incinerate the Junk You Eat" before you go ahead and comment on the unfairness of human sex differences in the response to exercise on Facebook.
    References:
    • Donnelly, Joseph E., and Bryan K. Smith. "Is exercise effective for weight loss with ad libitum diet? Energy balance, compensation, and gender differences." Exercise and sport sciences reviews 33.4 (2005): 169-174.
    • Grove, K. L., et al. "A microarray analysis of sexual dimorphism of adipose tissues in high-fat-diet-induced obese mice." International Journal of Obesity 34.6 (2010): 989-1000.
    • Henderson, Gregory C., and N. J. New Brunswick. "Sexual dimorphism in the effects of exercise on metabolism of lipids to support resting metabolism." Diabetes 5 (2014): 162.
    • Shi, H., and D. J. Clegg. "Sex differences in the regulation of body weight." Physiology & behavior 97.2 (2009): 199-204.
    • Talanian, Jason L., et al. "Two weeks of high-intensity aerobic interval training increases the capacity for fat oxidation during exercise in women." Journal of applied physiology 102.4 (2007): 1439-1447.

    Dietary Zinc & Copper Improve Glucose & Lipid Metabolism. High Cortisol Amplitudes Counter Belly Fat. Hypoxic Hearts Love Creatine + Ribose. Apples Counter Cancer & Obesity

    I guess this is about as close as we have hitherto gotten to understand why we got fat. Wrt to the hilarious pace at which we got fat and are still getting fatter, we are much better informed though.
    After you've learned about the general importance of exercise for your health and a couple of tweaks that may or, as in the case of sugary "energy drink", may not help you maximize the benefits and performance gains on Saturday. The focus of today's SuppVersity article is on the results of non-exercise related studies that highlight non-exercise related confounders of your health.

    Before we get to the actual news, I would yet like to invite all of you to take a look back at the increasingly obese history of the US... I suppose those of you who have not yet seen the link on my Facebook wall, will enjoy the animated obesity map in the Atlantic article from April 11. I mean, even if we still don't have anything but over-simplistic cookie-cutter "explanations" of why we get fat, the map shows that we do at least know how fast we got fat!

    You don't feel knowing about how fast we got fat is good news? Ok, maybe you'll like one the following results from recent studies better:

    • Dietary zinc & copper influence glucose & lipid metabolism in women (Shab-Bidar. 2013) According to a recent study from the Obesity Research Center at Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Tehran, Iran, there is a gender specific effect of copper and zinc in the diet on glucose and lipid metabolism of men and women in Iran - statistical significant effects were observed only in women with...
        Odds ratios for the MetS and low HDL across quartiles of copper intake (Shab-Bidar. 2013)
      • higher zinc intakes being associated with higher HDL-C, lower triglycerides (TG) and lower 2-hour blood glucose, and 
      • higher copper intake correlating with higher HDL-C, lower fasting blood glucose (FBG), significantly lower TG and a huge 81% reduction in the risk for suffering from metabolic syndrome (highest vs. lowest copper intakes)
      These observations stand in contrast with the current notion of the "bad" copper and the "good" zinc and reamphasize the importance of both nutrients for metabolic health.
      Remember: Two questions that will still have to be resolved pertain to (a) the gender-specificity of the effects and (b) confounding effects of food quality / choice and thus whether the same beneficial effects would be observed with the standard American diet.
      For both, but espicially for copper a little more than the RDA does not appear to hurt: What's particularly interesting, is that contrary to the zinc intakes in quartile 4 (>14mg/day; RDA 9mg/day) the copper intake in quartile 4 was more than 3x higher than the current RDA for women (0.9 mg). In fact, even the copper intake in the lowest quartile ~1.5mg/day was way above the RDA. If that's something we have to be surprised about is yet questionable, after all, there is not exactly much research on "optimal copper nutrition" (much contrary to zinc, by the way) and the RDA is based on age-old depletion-repletion studies and will thus probably reflect the absolute minimum to maintain "normal" serum levels.

    • Evidence from human study: Flat cortisol profile not averages or spikes are associated with increased adiposity and visceral obesity (Sharp. 2013) In their most recent paper that's soon going to be published in the American Journal of Human Biology Dan S. Sharp and his colleagues from the Center for Disease Control and the State University of New York provide conclusive evidence for the irrelevance of mean cortisol levels with respect to the purported negative effects of cortisol on visceral obesity.
      Associations between sextiles of within-subjects cortisol standard deviation (SD) in 217 Buffalo policemen and adjusted lean-mass trunk index (Sharp. 2013)
      As the data in the figure above clearly shows, the police officers with the greatest cortisol fluctuations (spikes and troughs) had the highest ratio of lean body mass to trunk mass. It is thus, as the scientists phrase it,
      "not the average level of salivary cortisol among 18 specimens on each officer that drives the association; it is the variation among specimens."
      The oral cortisol measures were taken on 3 subsequent days in standardized procedures that involved a venipuncture and a standardized high protein meal as "challenges", on day 1, six measures that were taken by the police officers over the course of the day, on day 2, and series of tests that was taken after a dexamethasone challenge after waking on day 3 (the subjects had ingested 0.5mg of dexamethasone the night before).
      Bottom line: While the scientists are careful in pointing out that it will still have to be established that the results translate to other populations. The results corroborate the uselessness (if not potential detrimental effects) of "cortisol blockers", I've discussed in my previous in the Science Round Up Seconds on March 29, 2013 (read more).

    • Combination of creatine and d-ribose heals damaged, but unscarred rodent-hearts (Caretti. 2013) While the many of the "daggered" claims* on the boxes of various "advanced" creatine products (learn more about their uselessness) are probably a little overblown (*the dagger refers to the "not verified by the FDA"), that's nothing compared to the absolutely disappointing results trainees had with d-ribose. Meanwhile, it seems as if even the last jerk knew that the unbearably sweet simple sugar is nothing worth spending his/her money on.

      Ribose regulates the novo synthesis and restoration nucleotides, can relieve the energy toll of ischemia  and its usefulness in the context of CVD is backed by rodent and human studies (Shecterle. 2011)
      In view of it's physiological role in the recovery of ATP levels (Helsten. 2004), it was assumed that supplementatal D-ribose would ameliorate the ATP depleting effects on exercise and improve endurance in glycolytic and/or long endurance activities, yet...
      "[...s]tudies examining the effect of ribose on performance during intense intermittent exercise and rowing have not been able to demonstrate improved performance in humans." (King. 2012)
      Other than the non-existence of side-effects, pertaining studies, which used up to ∼40 g/day, as well as acute and chronic supplementation regimen did  yet not yield any positive results

      Now, the aforementioned studies on the ergogenic effects of d-ribose were conducted in healthy individuals, in whom the ATP re-synthesis obviously does not depend (and not even benefit) from the provision of the monosaccharid that was discovered by Emil Fischer in 1891, when he analyzed the carbon structure of gum arabic (Prince. 2012). "Healthy" would yet not be the correct term to describe the rodents in the recently conducted study by Caretti et al. who observed that five week-old mice who were exposed to an atmosphere containing 10% O2 for 10 days in order to induce right ventricle hypertrophy and left ventricle apoptosis did not show any signs of cardiac damage, when they were gavaged creatine + D-ribose, every day.

      And while both phenotypes, i.e. the hypertrophy of the right and apoptosis of the left ventricle, were blunted to a certain degree by creatine or d-ribose, only their reversed the pathogenic changes to the heart muscle "almost" completely, by normalizing the expression of AMPK and Akt signaling in the hearts of the rodents.
      Light micrograph of representative nuclear pro-files (background, red = atypical, green = normal nuclei; my emphasis) and volume (%) of atypical cardiac cells in anterior left ventricle of rodents on caffeine + nicotine + ephedrine combo (learn more)
      Bottom line: While they may not be beneficial for the average trainee, people "on" the literally heart-breaking combination of nicotine + caffeine and ephedrine, could be able to reduce their detrimental effects on the heart (learn more), by adding this combination of proven (creatine) and disproven (d-ribose) ergogenics to their supplement regimen. People with sleep-apnea and other conditions which will leave the heart poorly oxygenized for longer time-periods should obviously benefit, as well.

      Based on the likewise promising results of previous studies in (human!) subjects with congestive heart failure (e.g. Omran. 2003), a daily dose of 5g d-ribose, along with the tried an proven chronic ingestion of 5g of creatine appears to be a good starting point, until respective human trials have been conducted.

    • Further evidence for the "An apple a day..." theory (Rago. 2013) In an allegedly methodically complicated, but very comprehensive analysis of the effects of raw, whole apples on the plasma metabolome of rodents, researchers from the University of Copenhagen found
      Total antioxidant activity (µmol vitamin C equivalents/g) of various fruits (Boyer. 2004)
      "that the intake of fresh apple in rats has a considerable and specific impact on the plasma metabolite profile, reflecting altered gut microbial metabolism, retarded lipid- and protein catabolism, and lowered metabolic, oxidative and steroid-related stress". (Rago. 2013)
      These results stand in line with the recent observations a group of Spanish researchers made, when they added a polyphenol extract from apples to the chow of rodents on an obesogenic high-fat + high sugar (HFS) diet:
      "Our results from histological studies demonstrated that supplementation of HFS with AP markedly reversed the enlargement of adipocyte volume induced by HFS diet intake in the epididymal fat pad, reducing it by almost 28% [...it also] reversed the increase in the population of large epididymal adipocytes, especially with diameters higher than 130m." (Boqu. 2013)
      The visceral specific effects of the apple polyphenols in the Boqué study could thus be interpreted as supportive evidence for the real-world significance of the metabolomic changes Rago et al. observed in the afore-cited study.
      Bottom line: No reason to be scared of the "high fructose fruit" apple. It comes with all HFCS sweetened beverages don't have. Polyphenols, vitamins, minerals and most importantly a flesh from which the fructose is extracted only slowly. Still, I have to warn you: Apple consumption can have profound beneficial effects on your health, such as (random examples)
      •  - 17% colorectal cancer risk (Michels. 2006)
      •  - 37% wheeze risk in your offspring (Willers. 2007)
      •  - 21% reduced risk for cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx (Gallus. 2005)
      •  - 25% reduced risk for oesophagus (Gallus. 2005) 
      •  - 18% / -15% / -9% risk red. for breast / ovary / prostate cancer (Gallus. 2005)
      and obviously the - 15% reduced breast cancer risk, the if you want to avoid these, you should thus better keep obsessing about the high fructose content of apples and stick to sausages and lard ;-)

    References:
    • Boqué N, de la Iglesia R, de la Garza AL, Milagro FI, Olivares M, Bañuelos O, Soria AC, Rodríguez-Sánchez S, Martínez JA, Campión J. Prevention of diet-induced obesity by apple polyphenols in Wistar rats through regulation of adipocyte gene expression and DNA methylation patterns. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2013 Mar 25.
    • Boyer J, Liu RH. Apple phytochemicals and their health benefits. Nutr J. 2004 May 12;3:5.
    • Caretti A, Bianciardi P, Marini M, Abruzzo PM, Bolotta A, Terruzzi C, Lucchina F, Samaja M. Supplementation of creatine and ribose prevents apoptosis and right ventricle hypertrophy in hypoxic hearts. Curr Pharm Des. 2013 Apr 10. [Epub ahead of print]  
    • Gallus S, Talamini R, Giacosa A, Montella M, Ramazzotti V, Franceschi S, Negri E, La Vecchia C. Does an apple a day keep the oncologist away? Ann Oncol. 2005 Nov;16(11):1841-4. 
    • Hellsten Y, Skadhauge L, Bangsbo J. Effect of ribose supplementation on resynthesis of adenine nucleotides after intense intermittent training in humans. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2004;286:R182–8.
    • Michels KB, Giovannucci E, Chan AT, Singhania R, Fuchs CS, Willett WC. Fruit and vegetable consumption and colorectal adenomas in the Nurses' Health Study. Cancer Res. 2006 Apr 1;66(7):3942-53. PubMed PMID: 16585224.  
    • Omran H, Illien S, MacCarter D, St Cyr J, Lüderitz B. D-Ribose improves diastolic function and quality of life in congestive heart failure patients: a prospective feasibility study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2003 Oct;5(5):615-9.  
    • Price, NPJ. The Name of the–ose: An Editorial on Carbohydrate Nomenclature. J Glycobiol. 2012; 1(e105).
    • Rago D, Kristensen M, Gözde G, Federico M, Morten P, LarsOve D. LC–MS metabolomics approach to investigate the effect of raw apple intake in the rat plasma metabolome. Metabolomics. 2013; 1573-3882.
    • Shab-Bidar S, Hosseini-Esfahani F, Mirmiran P, Mehran M, Azizi F. Dietary intakes of zinc and copper and cardiovascular risk factors in Tehranian adults: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Nutrition & Dietetics. 2013
    • Sharp DS, Andrew ME, Fekedulegn DB, Burchfiel CM, Violanti JM, Wactawski-Wende J, Miller DB. The cortisol response in policemen: Intraindividual variation, not concentration level, predicts truncal obesity. Am J Hum Biol. 2013 Apr 20.
    • Shecterle LM, Wagner S, St Cyr JA. A sugar for congestive heart failure patients. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2011 Apr;5(2):95-7.
    • Willers SM, Devereux G, Craig LC, McNeill G, Wijga AH, Abou El-Magd W, Turner SW, Helms PJ, Seaton A. Maternal food consumption during pregnancy and asthma, respiratory and atopic symptoms in 5-year-old children. Thorax. 2007 Sep;62(9):773-9. Epub 2007 Mar 27.