6x Bananas a Day!? Meta-Analysis: Lower Glucose, Insulin and HbA1c Levels From 'Catalytic' Dose of 36g Fructose

Figure 1: At least according to the USDA data, the average US citizen did never in the last 40 years get even close to the "catalytic" dose of fructose - at least not if we go by his / her daily HFCS consumption.

I usually don't start these articles with a disclaimer, but in this case I want to make sure that this post is not misinterpreted as a corn-refiners advertisement (and contrary to one of the authors of the Sievenpiper study, Coca Cola has unfortunately as of yet never covered my travel expenses ;-)... anyways, whenever the word "fructose" is used in the following lines it to the simple monosaccharide found as part of a complex nutrient matrix in many plants and their fruits (who would have expected that?). It is not used to denote the controversial results of a three-step enzymatic isolation process (Cornstarch → alpha-amylase → oligosaccharides + glucoamylase →  glucose + xylose isomerase →  42% fructose + 50–52% glucose + other sugar; cf. Wikipedia. "High Fructose Corn Syrup") that's at the heart of a very emotional debate about who would be to blame for the current obesity epidemic, now that the bad fats are no longer bad enough to be the scapegoat and ultima ratio for why we get fat.

Junk food is more than HFCS and fruit is more than fructose!

Fortunately, you, as a "whole food eating" SuppVersity reader, don't really have to care about the whole HFCS business. With your minimal intake of processed foods, your exposure to high fructose corn syrup should ideally be identical to the one of the parents and grandparents of America's obese children in the flower power seventies (~0.1-1g, see figure 1); a time, when your parents would not tell you to "beware of high fructose corn syrup", but to stay away from "those hairy, drug-addicted, reprobate hippies next door". Against that background, today's SuppVersity article is to be understood as an incentive to rethink, whether or not it is really necessary, let alone beneficial to deprive yourself of a whole class of vitamin and micronutrient-laden foods, simply because they contain a small number of molecules of which you are told that they "must not to be eaten, if you want to stay lean & healthy".

To help your thought process along, I have compiled the data from a recently published meta-analysis (that's a study, the results of which are based on data from multiple previous trials, which was weighed and compiled to come up with "new" data with a larger empirical foundation and thus greater significance). And I am honestly curious whether or not the evidence Sievenpiper and his colleagues presented in favor of the existence of a"catalytic dose" of  ≤36g/day of fructose that's been shown to improve, not compromise, blood glucose, insulin and HBA1C, when it is consumed instead of 36g of carbs from other sources (the studies in the review used either starches or simple sugars with almost identical beneficial results, by the way) will have catalytic effects on your opinion making process ;-)

Figure 2:  Effect of isoenergetic exchange of "catalytic" fructose doses (≤36g/d) for other carbohydrates (starches or simple sugars) on glycaemic endpoints: HbA1c, fasting blood glucose and fasting blood insulin, data calculated based on analysis of the scarce literature that is currently available (adapted from Sievenpiper. 2012)

The improvements in HbA1C, which is still the gold standard for evaluating long-term blood sugar level, in fasting blood glucose and insulin levels were across the board statistically significant, regardless of whether or not you apply the quality criteria, Sievenpiper and his colleagues used to weigh the results of the individual studies (cf. figure 2). Accordingly, the authors are right, when they point out that

[...] this small meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials supports earlier13C NMR spectroscopy investigations and acute feeding studies showing that ‘catalytic’ doses (≤36g/d) of fructose may improve glycaemic control [and that this] benefit is seen without the adverse cardiometabolic effects reported when fructose is fed at high doses or as excessenergy. (Sievenpiper. 2012)

Based on the data in figure 1, which clearly shows that the "average American" does not and never did pass this "catalytic threshold level" it may - at first sight appear odd that 42% of your countrymen and -women are supposed to be obese by the year 2030 (Hellmich. 2012)... at least for so long until you realize that for every American who follows your lead and consumes virtually no HFCS, there must be another one who consumes this person's 43.3g of HFCS on top of his own 43.3g of HFCS on a daily basis and would thus easily surpass the "scientifically proven" catalytic threshold levels which was (and I leave it up to you to decide whether this is coincidence or not) in none of the studies achieved from HFCS intake, by the way (I guess I don't have to tell you that my calculation is of mere illustrative nature, despite the fact that the 43.3g /day HFCS intake are actually from the USDA dataset for 2010).

Bad news for the guy who eats / drinks your daily share of 43.3g of high fructose corn syrup, ...

...but what does that mean for you? As long as your only significant fructose source are whole fruits and the few vegetables that contain more than trace amounts of fructose, you can answer this question by taking a look at the data in figure 3. The small figures on top of the bars will tell you how many 100g servings of apples, dates, pears or tomatoes you can consume until you hit the catalytic limit*uhuhhh...*: 3.9x 100g servings, of apples, for examples, or 5x 100g servings of bananas, or a whopping 32.7x 100g servings of lemons... sounds plenty? Well, I don't know, but certainly plenty enough to finally stop worrying when Adelfo Cerame would not ruin his health, let alone his physique, when he eats a banana along with his postworkout shake, wouldn't you agree?

Figure 3: Number of 100g servings of various common fruits to get to the more or less arbitrary  ≤36g/day threshold.

Notwithstanding, this ≤36g/day limit does certainly appears more or less arbitrary. This is all the more true in face of previous results by Livesey & Taylor, who could not find evidence that such a thing as a "threshold dosage" for the Hb1AC improving effects of fructose even exists (Livesey. 2008) or the fact that a "low-GI fruit intake [and not the number of servings of fiber-laden cereals!] was the strongest independent predictor of [lowered] HbA1c" in a 2011 6-months low-GI diet experiment by Jenkins et al. who compared Kellog's... ah, pardon me, I meant the medical orthodoxy's gold standard, the high-cereal fiber diet in 152 participants with type 2 diabetes with a simple low-GI diet (Jenkins. 2011).

Can ≤35g of fructose per day really be the answer to everything?

Though the main reason for the arbitrariness of the 36g limit certainly is the scarcity of valid experimental data from well-controlled human trials, Sievenpieper et al. claim that their reference for the "catalytic range" was in accordance with "an emerging literature" that "has shown that low-dose fructose (≤10g/meal) may benefit glycaemic control".

Now, those of you who have read my "Carbohydrate Shortage in Paleo Land" post from back in June 2011, will probably remember that from a mere physiological point of view every healthy (=nondiabetic and with an intact liver) human being, including the tiniest woman, should be able to handle a minimum of ~100g of carbohydrates on a daily basis. If we now take the 2:1 glucose to fructose ratio, of which Walliset al. found that it is just as effective in repleting muscle gylcogen stores after a workout as the same amount (90g) of pure glucose, and apply it to the 36g fructose threshold this yields a "total carbohydrate threshold" of 108g - coincidence or physiological necessity?

And even when you didn't replace some of the starches or other simple sugars for your daily dose of 2kg of apples (another example of exclusively illustrative nature), you would maybe get fatter, but according to the results of Silbernagel et al. not a single gram fatter than from the same amounts of calories from glucose from fructose or glucose conducted with healthy young men; cf. Silbernagel. 2011).

You can have another apple today and will still (or rather hence?) live tomorrow ;-)

Image 3 (edited in response to anon & JP, thx!): Certainly impressive what lifelong caloric restriction did to the 27.6 year-old ape on the right, if you take a look at his wrinkled age-mate on the left, no? Suggested read: "Health and Longevity Effects of Intermittent Fasting"

Overall it does therefore seem more than unlikely that a healthy, non-sedentary or even athletic individual has to worry about eating another apple, when he or she already reached their purported catalytic limit of 36g with the pound of blackberries, two bananas and a huge grapefruit this person could have eaten earlier in the day.

Moreover, skipping on the apple would also mean that you would miss out on its recently confirmed life-extending effects (+130% in yeast; Palermo. 2012), of which Vanessa Palermo and her colleagues from the Dept. of  Biology and Biotechnology “Charles Darwin” have shown that they are the prerogative of the whole fruit and not a result of the high antioxidant or polyphenol content of apples, as they occurred only, when the yeast is treated with a handcrafted extract that had approximately 26.7 g/100ml of fresh apple in it... and guess what, that apple, Golden Delicicious, happens to be one of my personal favorites, taste-wise, or course ;-)

Bottom line: I know it is more than questionable to which extend (1:20, 1:100, not at all?) the lastly cited life-prolonging effects of whole apples can be extrapolated to human beings, but that does neither diminish the perplexing results of Sivenpiper's meta-analysis nor long-established cancer protective effects of fruits in general and apples in particular (eg.  Veeriah. 2006;  McCann. 2007; Yoon, 2007; Gerhauser. 2008; Zessner. 2008; Jedrychowsk. 2009; Liu. 2010; Reagan-Shaw. 2010) and should therefore suffice to put more than a non-legible font-size "1" questionmark behind any previously taken decision of yours that it would be better to deprive yourself of these delicious superfoods (=fruits) than trust on your livers ability to to what she has evolved to do and turn the slow influx of relatively low amounts of fructose and glucose into energy and deliver the rest of the vitamins, polyphenols, and other micronutrients via the bloodstream to other organs.

References:

• Gerhauser C. Cancer chemopreventive potential of apples, apple juice, and apple components. Planta Med. 2008 Oct;74(13):1608-24. Epub 2008 Oct 14. Review. 
• Hellmich J. Obesity could affect 42% of Americans by 2030. USA TODAY. Aug 05, 2012 < http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/story/2012-05-07/obesity-projections-adults/54791430/1 > accessed Aug 07, 2012
• Jandrain BJ, Pallikarakis N, Normand S, Pirnay F, Lacroix M, Mosora F, Pachiaudi C, Gautier JF, Scheen AJ, Riou JP, et al. Fructose utilization during exercise in men: rapid conversion of ingested fructose to circulating glucose. J Appl Physiol. 1993 May;74(5):2146-54.
• Jedrychowski W, Maugeri U. An apple a day may hold colorectal cancer at bay: recent evidence from a case-control study. Rev Environ Health. 2009
• Jenkins DJ, Srichaikul K, Kendall CW, Sievenpiper JL, Abdulnour S, Mirrahimi A, Meneses C, Nishi S, He X, Lee S, So YT, Esfahani A, Mitchell S, Parker TL, Vidgen E, Josse RG, Leiter LA. The relation of low glycaemic index fruit consumption to glycaemic control and risk factors for coronary heart disease in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2011 Feb;54(2):271-9. 
• Livesey G, Taylor R. Fructose consumption and consequences for glycation, plasma triacylglycerol, and body weight: meta-analyses and meta-regression models of intervention studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008; 88, 1419–1437. 
• Liu L, Li YH, Niu YB, Sun Y, Guo ZJ, Li Q, Li C, Feng J, Cao SS, Mei QB. An  apple oligogalactan prevents against inflammation and carcinogenesis by targeting LPS/TLR4/NF-κB pathway in a mouse model of colitis-associated colon cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2010 Oct;31(10):1822-32. 
• McCann MJ, Gill CI, O' Brien G, Rao JR, McRoberts WC, Hughes P, McEntee R,  Rowland IR. Anti-cancer properties of phenolics from apple waste on colon carcinogenesis in vitro. Food Chem Toxicol. 2007 Jul;45(7):1224-30. 
• Reagan-Shaw S, Eggert D, Mukhtar H, Ahmad N. Antiproliferative effects of apple peel extract against cancer cells. Nutr Cancer. 2010;62(4):517-24. 
• Palermo V, Mattiv, F, Silvestri R, La  Regina G, Falcone CM. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2012 [Article in press]
• Sievenpiper JL, Chiavaroli L, de Souza RJ, Mirrahimi A, Cozma AI, Ha V, Wang DD, Yu ME, Carleton AJ, Beyene J, Di Buono M, Jenkins AL, Leiter LA, Wolever TM, Kendall CW, Jenkins DJ. 'Catalytic' doses of fructose may benefit glycaemic control without harming cardiometabolic risk factors: a small meta-analysis of randomised controlled feeding trials. Br J Nutr. 2012 Aug;108(3):418-23.
• Silbernagel G, Machann J, Unmuth S, Schick F, Stefan N, Häring HU, Fritsche A.Effects of 4-week very-high-fructose/glucose diets on insulin sensitivity, visceral fat and intrahepatic lipids: an exploratory trial. Br J Nutr. 2011 Jul;106(1):79-86. 
• Veeriah S, Kautenburger T, Habermann N, Sauer J, Dietrich H, Will F, Pool-Zobel BL. Apple flavonoids inhibit growth of HT29 human colon cancer cells and modulate expression of genes involved in the biotransformation of xenobiotics. Mol Carcinog. 2006 Mar;45(3):164-74. 
• Wallis GA, Hulston CJ, Mann CH, Roper HP, Tipton KD, Jeukendrup AE. Postexercise muscle glycogen synthesis with combined glucose and fructose ingestion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Oct;40(10):1789-94.
• Wikipedia contributors, "High-fructose corn syrup," Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, < http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=High-fructose_corn_syrup&oldid=505539604 > accessed August 7, 2012. 
• Yoon H, Liu RH. Effect of selected phytochemicals and apple extracts on  NF-kappaB activation in human breast cancer MCF-7 cells. J Agric Food Chem. 2007  Apr 18;55(8):3167-73. Epub 2007 Mar 21.
• Zessner H, Pan L, Will F, Klimo K, Knauft J, Niewöhner R, Hümmer W, Owen R,  Richling E, Frank N, Schreier P, Becker H, Gerhauser C. Fractionation of polyphenol-enriched apple juice extracts to identify constituents with cancer chemopreventive potential. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2008 Jun;52 Suppl 1:S28-44.

- 66% Body Fat! 7 Weeks of Intense (!) Exercise and Moderate (!) Caloric Restriction Transforms Biggest Losers into Healthy Winners. Improvements Persist 4 Month After.

Image 1: Coming soon
on NBC - the next season
of the Biggest Loser; this
time big couples

I don't know if you have followed the 'Biggest Loser" TV show. Other than the show itself, which I obviously must have missed (I still wonder how that could happen ;-), the recently published study (Ashmadi. 2011) on the effects combined intense exercise and moderate caloric restriction had on the 17 sedentary, morbidly obese contestants (32+/-11 years; 50/50 men/women), of which 3 were excluded from the study, because their arteries were not yet VERSTOPFT enough, really got my intention. After all, finally someone got the order of the words "intense" and "moderate" in relation to exercise and caloric restriction right... its no longer about starving yourself and walking from the couch to the refrigerator, when your weight has gone up into regions (>>300lbs+), where no man, god-beware woman, had gone before (I guess the introduction of high fructose corn syrup and trans-fats were to the average American what the Warp drive was for Captain Kirk ;-)...

In the three month, the show was aired, the participants who were voted off by their peers on a weekly base exercised 3.3 +/-2.1 h a day, of which only 50% were initially supervised. They received lectures on "exercise and general dietary measures" - which certainly did not match the quality of the information you are served on the SuppVersity on a daily base - and they were instructed to consume a diet with a macronutrient ratio of 30:45:35 (protein /carbohydrate / fat) that would provide them with at leas 70% of their resting daily energy expenditure (RDEE), which was (unfortunately) not measured but calculated by the following standard equation: RDEE = 21.6 x lean mass [in kg] + 370

Figure 1: Markers related to blood glucose, blood lipid, heart health and body composition of 14 morbidly obese participants of the "Biggest Loser" TV show 7 month after baseline (3 month after the show)
(data adapted from Ashmadi. 2011)

It really does not matter, whether you saw the visual results on TV or not, from the data I plotted in figure 1, alone, you can tell that the "big losers" really transformed their lives. Four months after the show was wrapped, the mean weight loss among the 14 subjects that were included in this study still amounted to >132lbs, of which more than 80% were fat - thank god, they got the order of intense and moderate right! What you could not see on the TV pictures, though, were the profound health effects:

serum insulin level (-52%), glucose (-21%), high-sensitivity CRP (-81%), HbA1c (-11%) [indicator of long term blood glucose levels], PAI-1 (-49%) [plasminogen activator inhibitor-1], TNFRII (-12%) [tumor necrosis factor receptor-II], and CIMT (-25%) [carotid intima media thickness]

Video 1: Stopping at 20s won't get you lean. Intensity in the gym, moderation in the kitchen. These are the keys to success - Bob, knew it all along. And you better don't make him angry ;-)

all decreased significantly, whereas the scientists recorded profound increases of positive markers of metabolic and heart health, such as a +132% improvement of the carotid artery distensibility index [CaDI], a whopping 344% and 94% increase in resistin and adiponectin, respectively and +73% higher levels of Lp(a).

While, as a diligent and well-informed student of the SuppVersity, you should not have learned anything completely new from the study, I bet you have a friend or relative who still has not got the attribution of intense exercise and moderate diet right and is just about to lose the last lbs of lean mass on the latest starvation diet from people magazine. In that case you better do it like Bob (see video 1) and tell him/her the way to go.

Energy Drinks Before Workout Make You Thirsty. Single HIIT Session Every 14 Days Maintains Fitness in the Off-Season. Postprandial Walk Decreases HbA1c by 5%. Cardio Before Weights Increases pAKT +87% Over Weights Alone

You simply cannot start "working out" too early - even if it's just child's play.

"Three for one!" No, I am not trying to sell you three bottles of "uberpotent" test-boosters for the rat of one. Three for one that's the SuppVersity Figure of the Week and it is the ratio of the decrease in breast cancer risk in women and the hours of physical activity per week during their adolescence.

According to a 2004 review by Lagerros, Hsieh and Hsieh, each additional* hour of weekly physical activity is associated with a -3% risk of developing breast cancer later in life (Lagerros. 2004)

Needless to say that the "additional" hours are in addition to the low physical activity in the laziest of the study participants, who had a 20% higher risk of developing breast cancer than their most active peers.

So what else do we have today? With this primer on the importance of physical activity esp. in the critical periods of your / your children's and grand-children's lives, let's delve right into a "special edition" of the Saturdaily "Short News" with a focus on a selection of very recent results from exercise-related studies.

• Energy drink before a workout make you thirsty. don't enhance performance (Tanskanen. 2013) While the mantra of the "intra-workout" beverage producer that you need at least a small amount of carbohydrates to optimally absorb the added salts, a recent study from the University of Jyväskylä in Finland showed that the ingestion of both high- and low-carb (33g vs. 10g) caffeine-containing energy drinks before the workout resulted in a temporary increase in thirst compared to to both caffeinated (106mg, just as the two energy drinks) an non-caffeinated water.
  
  

  

  With +1kg Fat in 4 Weeks from less than 2 energy drinks/day, thirst may be the least problem you will have if you guzzle "energy drinks" (learn more).

  The fact that the increase in thirst was only transient, and decreased in the course of the 60min cycling exercise (60% VO2max) the healthy young adults had to perform, as well as the non-existent differences in hydration status between the groups do yet show that these effects were practically irrelevant. Incidentally, the latter has to be said for the promised / expected performance enhancing effects of energy drinks - with the relatively low amount of caffeine in the drinks, there were no significant differences between the the time the 10 participants cycled on an incremental test to exhaustion that followed the "steady-state-cardio" during each and every of the four testing days of this randomized, crossover study.

  ---

  Putting things into perspective: The fact that previous trials yielded different results, esp. wrt to the performance enhancing effects of caffeine, is probably attributable to a the low dosage of caffeine. Another very recent study by Ranchordas & Kenzie, for example has just confirmed that a compbination of 32g of carbs and 300mg of caffeine can "enhance some aspects of soccer-related fitness including acceleration, maximal velocity, 20-m sprint speed, speed-endurance, and lower RPE during repetitive sprints compared with CHO-only and PLA beverages." (Ranchordas. 2013)

 

• 

  Remember the "Iranian HIIT Solution" - 9% body fat in 12 weeks? Perfect evidence: HIIT is not for athletes, only.

  It does not take much to stay fit, a single every other week HIIT session is enough (Rønnestad. 2013) Right from the former Olympia "Metropolis" *rofl* Lillehammer comes a study which shows that trained athletes like semiprofessional soccer players can maintain their baseline fitness levels in the off-season by no more than a single HIIT session, which consisted of five bouts of 4 min running at 87–97% of age-predicted maximum heart rate, every other week.
  
  The overall loss in the distance the subjects covered during the 20-m shuttle run did obviously decline (-8% ± 6%), but the difference to the control group that performed the same HIIT sessions on a weekly basis was non-significantly different from the every-other-week group.Moreover, both groups maintain their VOmax over the whole six week study period.

  ---

  Bottom line: A little of HIIT can go a long way ... wait, this is almost the title of a previous SuppVersity post, i.e. "Some HIIT For Life & Less LISS For More! How to Burn 27,300 Kcal Extra W/out Losing a Single Extra Pound of Fat!", of which I would really suggest you read it now, in case you are still not convinced that a reasonably dosed amount of HIIT makes a valuable addition to almost every trainees regimen.

 

• Hit the weights! If you want to do more than just increase your daily activity levels to lower your HbA1c, don't waste your time on the treadmill. Increase your daily activity level and lift weights! Three supervised resistance training sessions per week for 10 weeks have been shown in a 2009 study by Bweir to be significantly more effective in lowering the Hb1Ac levels than in adults with type II diabetes than an isoenergetic (=spending the same energy during the workout) treadmill exercise (Bweir. 2009).
  The postprandial stroll in the bark is an effective means to lower your HbA1c (Nygaard. 2013) While the former post on the conservation of the conditioning of a trained athletes by HIIT does confirm the notion that "aerobic exercise" in the original sense of the meaning, which would imply that you increase your body's exercise capacity (as evidenced by VO2max), another recently published study shows that metabolic benefits of exercise can be achieved with much lower intensities.
  
  At least in the in the South Asian immigrants with high risk of type 2 diabetes who participated in a recently conducted 12-week intervention, it took nothing but the figurative "walk in the park" (30min+ of physical activity of any sort) after a meal, to reduce their HbA1c levels - a marker of long(er) term glucose levels - by allegely relatively unimpressive, but statistically highly significant ~3% (p = 0.012). That the intervention in the course of which the average subject increased his / her daily activity by 40min compared to the control group did not yield any significant changes in body composition should yet be as evident as the fact that it was 100% side-effect free.

  ---

  Bottom line: It really depends on where you are and if you are a sedentary slob, even 40min of extra (light) activity a day can make a difference. After all, previous studies have shown that each 1% increase in HbA1c is associated with a 1% increase in cancer risk (data fro 25,476 patients with type 2 diabetes registered in the Swedish National Diabetes Register; cf. Miao Jonasson. 2012). 

• Rodent study says: Cardio does not hamper anabolic signalling (Souza. 2013) While the comprehensive review by Wilson et al. you've read about here at the SuppVersity several times (e.g. April 2012, January 2013, etc.) found that there is a
  

  "significant negative relationships between frequency (-0.26 to -0.35) and duration (-0.29 to -0.75) of endurance training for hypertrophy, strength, and power." (Wilson. 2012)

  a very recent study from the Universidade de Sao Paulo would suggest that the negative influence of endurance training on the anabolic stimulus of restistance training is either
  
  1. species specific and occurs only in humans, but not in rodents,
  2. occurs only with chronic high volume trainging, or
  3. is at least not related to changes in the AMPK, TSC2, mTOR, or p70S6K1 ratios
  Now while each of the former is certainly possible, my best bet would be that the training volume, i.e. 5 sets of 10 reps on a "rodent leg trainer" and a 60min endurance workout on the treadmill, and the fact that the protocol was performed only once are the main reasons that the AMPK, TSC2, mTOR, or p70S6K1 ratios were identical.

  ---

  

  Doing cardio before strength workouts results in a higher testosterone:cortisol ratio after the workout (learn more)

  One thing is remarkable, however: The scientists observed a pretty remarkable +87% increase in Akt phosphorylated/total ratio that occurred 2h post only in those rodents who performed a 60min bouts of treadmill running before their leg workout. What? Yeah, that's actually what Carl and I have been talking about in the past - "pre-workout glycogen depleting cardio as intensity technique" (learn more)

---

So what's left to do now? Ah, yes of course. The best wishes for the weekend and a brief link-list for those of you who can't be without SuppVersity news for another 24h.

• 

  "Going Nuts On Berries: Ellagic Acid in Rasp- and Blueberries, Pecans, Walnut & Co Protects Against Visceral Obesity" - I hope you are not one of the guys who spits the tiny seeds of the raspberries out. That is not just disgusting, you would also spit away ~90% of their ellagic acid content (learn more).

  Do you stand right? Scientists investigate the influence of dynamic vs. static posture on leg stiffness and future risk of fall (read more)
• Anabolic steroid use has distinct effects on tendons. Scientists speculate that the increased stiffness and higher modulus contribute to the frequent ruptures in chemical athletes (read more)
• Oldie but goldie: Do you cook the creatine out of your steaks? A mid 20th century paper shows that cooking degrades creatine to creatinine (read more)
• More walnut lovin' Despite the fact that you have to be careful with what you say about the health effects of walnuts, these days a group of reseachers does not fear the repressions from the FDA and says: "We found two novel mechanism that explain why walnuts are good for your heart!" (read more)

These and other news are already waiting for you on Facebook and you can bet that there will be at least half a dozen additional ones posted before the next official SuppVersity article will see the light of the day, tomorrow.

References:

• Bweir S, Al-Jarrah M, Almalty AM, Maayah M, Smirnova IV, Novikova L, Stehno-Bittel L. Resistance exercise training lowers HbA1c more than aerobic training in adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2009 Dec 10;1:27. doi: 10.1186/1758-5996-1-27.
• Miao Jonasson J, Cederholm J, Eliasson B, Zethelius B, Eeg-Olofsson K, Gudbjörnsdottir S. HbA1C and cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes--a nationwide population-based prospective cohort study in Sweden. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38784.
• Nygaard H, Grindaker E, Rønnestad B, Holmboe-Ottesen G, Høstmark AT. Long-term effects of daily postmeal physical activity - Preliminary results.International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism,2013, 23, S1 -S15.
• Ranchordas M, Kenzie J.Effect of carbohydrate only and carbohydrate plus caffeine co-ingestion on a battery of reliable soccer-specific tests. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism,2013, 23, S1 -S15.
• Rønnestad BR, Slettaløkken G. High-intensity interval training every second week maintains VO2max in soccer players. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism,2013, 23, S1-S15.
• Souza EO, Tricoli V, Bueno Junior C, Pereira MG, Brum PC, Oliveira EM, Roschel H, Aoki MS, Urginowitsch C. The acute effects of strength, endurance and concurrent exercises on the Akt/mTOR/p70S6K1 and AMPK signaling pathway responses in rat skeletal muscle. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2013 Apr 19:0.
• Tanskanen M, Heikkinen T, Linnamo V. Effects of caffeine drinks on endurance performance, fluid balance, and subjective feelings. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism,2013, 23, S1 -S15.
• Wilson JM, Marin PJ, Rhea MR, Wilson SM, Loenneke JP, Anderson JC. Concurrent training: a meta-analysis examining interference of aerobic and resistance exercises. J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Aug;26(8):2293-307.