.

.
marylin monroe
Showing posts with label fertility. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fertility. Show all posts

194 Bananas in 3 Weeks, Same Liver Fat & Lower Body Fat 6 Months After; Nigella Sativa Boosts Testosterone & Fertility; Sugar Dampens Caffeine Rush + Thyroid & Body Comp.

Three weeks of +1,000 kcal carb overfeeding (approx. 194 bananas!): Does it supersize your liver fat? This and more in today's installment of On Short Notice
As promised in yesterday's first part of the weekly written news-round up aka On Short Notice, we won't waste any time on lengthy introductions (the "short" items themselves are already long enough ;-) and get right down to business! For today this means that we are going to take a peak at the latest studies on
  • the reality of thyroid hormone metabolism
  • the dampening effects of sugar on high dose caffeine
  • the sugary truth about the reversibility of early NAFLD
  • the pro-testosterone, pro-fertility effect of black cumin
as well as the latest data on US drug sales and an upcoming blogpost discussing "training for anabolism" - enjoy!
Just in case you feel that's not enough, I suggest you listen to this week's installment of the SuppVersity Science News Roundup (click here to download) on Super Human Radio, as well!
  • Figure 1: The more energy reserves a metabolically healthy and euthyroid person has and the more he or she eats (though this was not quantified we can probably assume that the heavier participant also consumed more energy on a daily basis), the less energy efficient is his metabolism going to be - the margin is yet not unlimited, eat 40% more and get fat regardless of what type of food those calories come from (generated based on Roef. 2012)
    Levels of thyroid hormone associated with greater body weight and body fatness I know this sounds surprising, but int he end the latest results from the Department of Endocrinology at the Ghent University Hospital in Belgium only confirm what I keep preaching here at the SuppVersity over and over again: The main reason that the calories in vs. calories out calculations don't work is that the "calories out" part of the equation depends on both the "calories in" and the "calories stored", as well as the "accessibility of the calories stored" parameters, and [...].
    Put differently, the reason that the 941 generally healthy and euthyroid (=normal thyroid function) male siblings (25-45 yrs, median BMI 24.6) with the highest body weights and the greatest body fat mass also had the highest levels of leptin, free and total T3 & T4, as well as thyroid binding globulin is simple: In the presence of ample energy supply their bodies will treat their resources more wasteful, than those of the skinny or wanna-be-skinny, ah... I mean "ripped" guys who undereat and overtrain.
    The opposite is the case for the more muscular study participants, whose greater lean mass and muscle cross-sectional area were associated with lower (F)T3, (F)T4 and TBG levels (p ≤0.0003). They simply cannot afford (you could also say that they don't need) to ramp up their already higher fatty acid oxidation and overall energy expenditure, even further. Lastly, there was a clear-cut association with higher free T3 levels and lower insulin sensitivity, and - I had almost forgotten to mention that - "[n]o associations between TSH and body composition or metabolic parameters were seen."
    I suggest you print the finding about TSH levels and ask your doctor if he judges the speed of his car by looking at the gaspedal (TSH is more or less the gas-pedal that will tell your thyroid how hard it's got to work, but won't tell you how much of active thyroid hormone it is capable of producing) rather than the speedometer, when he is too cheap to order a full thyroid panel the next time you ask him to do so ;-)
  • Figure 2: While the initial caffeine spike is blunted by the ingestion of a sugar-laden breakfast, the area under the curve (bottom, right) a similar, yet less pronounced effect and both, the reduction of the initial spike in serum caffeine, as well as difference of the total influx over time are dose dependent (Skinner. 2012)
    Sugary breakfast reduces early rise in serum caffeine levels by up to 90% That's at least the result of a recent study by Tina Skinner and her colleagues from the University of Queensland in Down-Under. The high carbohydrate meal, in this case a toast with jam, cordial, and an energy bar ("Vanilla Crisp" PowerBar Performance Bar), the scientists served their 14 healthy active male participants (age 24.8 ± 3.7 yrs, body mass 74.6 ± 8.5 kg, height 184.0 ± 8.5 cm; mean ± SD) who had reported fasted, well hydrated and 48h after they had consumed their last caffeinated beverage at the lab (Skinner. 2012). It does not really take a rocket scientist to see that the absence of the initial onslaught of caffeine as a result of the pre-ingestion of the sugary "breakfast" will probably diminish, if not totally blunt the stimulating effects of coffee.
    In view of the fact that this effect was particularly pronounced during the "high dose" (=9mg/kg body weight; ~540-900mg; equiv. to 3-4.5 large cups of strong coffee), it is yet probably of greater importance for stim junkies and athletes looking for the pre-workout edge before they hit the gym, than for the average white color worker who needs to get his daily buzz, if he does not want to miss his bus (or train ;-)
  • Liver-fattening effects of carbohydrate overfeeding are genetically dispositioned, but the recently published data from a study that was conducted by scientists from the Minerva Foundation Institute for Medical Research, the University of Helsinki and other Finnish research facilities shows that an appropriate diet can reduce increased liver and body fat levels, reduce body fat levels and improve lipid and glucose metabolism, regardless of the genotype (PNPLA3-148II = disadvantaged vs. PNPLA3-148MM) of the subjects.
    But let's take on thing after the other. After some standard baseline tests, the 16 subjects (mean age 54 year; BMI at baseline 30.6kg/m²; 5 men, 11 women) were "overfed" with a high carbohydrate diet from the "every low-carbers worst nightmare" category:
    Figure 3: Change in body composition from due to 3-week overfeeding (blue), 6 months dieting (compared to post overfeeding - red; Sevastianova. 2012)
    "The subjects were instructed to continue their normal diet and in addition to consume an extra 1000 kcal/d with 98% of energy from carbohydrates. The extra diet consisted of candy (Oy Karl Fazer Ab), pineapple juice (Tuko Logistics Oy), sugar-sweetened soft drinks (Oy Hartwall Ab), and/or carbohydrate-loading drink (Squeezy Sports Nutrition GmbH) and was provided free of charge from the research unit to the study participants." (Sevastianova. 2012)
    As you will probably have expected the highly insulinogenic, additional 21,000kcal from glucose and fructose (~5250g or 194 bananas, medium size to be precise ;-) did leave "their marks" on the waist and hips of the subjects, but probably not to the extend you may have anticipated (see figure 1). Even more suprisingly, the short term overfeeding did not deteriorate any of the blood glucose parameters (all changes had p-values way beyond what would be statistcally significant, the glucose clearance over 2h did even improve! - statistically likewise non-significant, though).
    Most importantly, however, the body composition, triglyceride levels (-6%), HDL (+11%) and all the important body composition measures (see figure 3) improved and the liver fat returned to baseline in the course of the 6-months "diet period", which consisted of - mark my words - nothing but making a switch to a diet with more vegetables, less simple sugars, white flour, and alcoholic drinks and dietary counseling wrt to food types and appropriate (=moderate) portion sizes. No extreme low carbing, no drastic calorie reductions, just healthy whole foods - regardless of "your bad genes"!
  • Nigella sativa, aka black cumin, jacks up testosterone and makes tired sperm get a move on Being well aware that you cannot go without a weekly post about at least one natural testbooster,  you will probably be relieved to hear that Rahmatollah Parandin, Namdar Yousofvand and Rostam Ghorbani have published a paper in the latest issue of the Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine in which they describe the fertility and testosterone boosting effects of 200 and 400mg/kg of an alcoholic extract from Nigella sativa seeds (Parandin. 2012).
    *Reminder: Regardless of whether we are dealing with rodents or humans, a "testosterone booster" that works in sick animals or humans does not necessarily work in healthy ones, as well. It is much more likely, that the effects on testosterone are secondary to the effect of the effect the herb or whatever else has on the overall health of the lab animals / participants, so that someone who is not sick in the first place won't see any (or at best minimal) improvements.
    The seed extract that was administered to healthy*  male Wistar rats 60 days contained a mix of various active ingredients
    • 30-48% Thymoquinone,
    • 7-15% P-cymene, 
    • 6-12% Carvacrol, 
    • 2-7% 4-terpineol, 
    • 1-4% T-anethole, and 
    • 1-8% Sesquiterpene,
    of which Prandin et al. state that Thymogquinone is currently considered to be be the pharmacologically active constituent of N. sativa (cf. Padhye. 2008) - keep that in mind, when you cannot resist giving this stuff a try ;-)
    Now, the ~23% increase in testosterone is certainly nothing like the "140% increase in testosterone" certain supplement companies state one of the testers had (without any peer-reviewed data whatsoever, by the way), but as mediocre as it may seem, it was achieved from a healthy baseline level and it went hand in hand with improvements in all sperm parameters, of which I picked the sperm count and plotted it together with the latest human data from the University Department of Growth and Reproduction at the Rigshospitalet of the University of Copenhagen in Denmark in the second graph in figure 3 (Jørgensen. 2012).
    Figure 4: Yeah, Nigella boosts testosterone by 20% (left), but there are other things in life... what about it's effect on sperm count (right) for example? The increase the rodents in the high-dose group experients would catapult the infertile Danish men almost into the normal zone (based on Jørgensen. 2012 & Parandin. 2012)
    Now this is certainly by no means scientific evidence and I am not suggesting that it will help solve potential fertility problems (not just because sperm count is only one out of a dozen parameters, but also because we don't know whether what works in healthy rodents will work in sick people; see red box above for the other side of the coin). What I found quite important though, is to give you an idea of what those abstract numbers could eventually mean. Contrary to the 20% increase in testosterone which will hardly help you to build significantly more muscle mass, a similar bump in sperm count (and other fertility parameters) could very well make the difference between fertile and infertile!
    So, at whichever Internet source you may be able to dig up a respective extract and regardless of whether you want it for fertility or futility, ah... I mean "testosterone boosting" issues, make sure that it has a high Thymoquinone content and that you have enough of it to hit the human dose equivalent (click here to learn how to calculate HEDs) of 65mg/kg or 4-5g per day!
Figure 6: US Drug sales 2010 & 2011 as posted on the SuppVersity Facebook wall earlier today (based on Lindsay. 2012).
The End - for today, at least. I guess I won't take too much away, if I tell you that there was actually another item scheduled for today... a post about "High or Low, Long or Short, Heavy or Light what are the Best Set Numbers and Rest Times,Weights and Rep Schemes, When You're Training for Anabolism" - and while this is "anabolism" in the old and actually sort of outdated sense of more testosterone and less cortisol, I'm pretty confident that the muscle-heads among you would have liked it, if it did not get longer and longer, so that I decided to polish it up a little and put you on the rack for another two days or so ;-)

So, in case that's driving you crazy, you may want to consider asking your Dr. for a script for an antipsychotic, currently the #5 on the 2011 (=the latest) US drug sale ranking (see figure 6; remember the data is $-based not script-based), I posted along with a handful of other interesting news-items earlier today on the SuppVersity Facebook wall.

References:
  • Jørgensen N, Joensen UN, Jensen TK, Jensen MB, Almstrup K, Olesen IA, Juul A, Andersson AM, Carlsen E, Petersen JH, Toppari J, Skakkebæk NE. Human semen quality in the new millennium: a prospective cross-sectional population-based study of 4867 men. BMJ Open. 2012 Jul 2;2(4).
  • Lindsley CW. The top prescription drugs of 2011 in the United States: antipsychotics and antidepressants once again lead CNS therapeutics. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2012 Aug 15;3(8):630-1.
  • Roef G, Lapauw BM, Goemaere S, Zmierczak HG, Toye K, Kaufman JM, Taes Y. Body composition and metabolic parameters are associated with variation in thyroid hormone levels among euthyroid young men. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012 Sep 6.
  • Padhye S, Banerjee S, Ahmad A. Mohammad R. Sarkar FH. From here to eternity- the secret of Pharaohs: Therapeutic potential of black cumin seeds and beyond. Cancer Ther 2008; 6: 495-510
  • Parandin R, Yousofvand N, Ghorbani R. The enhancing effects of alcoholic extract of Nigella sativa seed on fertility potential, plasma gonadotropins and testosterone in male rats. Iran J Reprod Med. July 2012; 10(4): 355-362.
  • Sevastianova K, Santos A, Kotronen A, Hakkarainen A, Makkonen J, Silander K, Peltonen M, Romeo S, Lundbom J, Lundbom N, Olkkonen VM, Gylling H, Fielding BA, Rissanen A, Yki-Järvinen H. Effect of short-term carbohydrate overfeeding and long-term weight loss on liver fat in overweight humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Sep 5.
  • Skinner TL, Jenkins DG, Folling J, Leveritt MD, Coombes JS, Taaffe DR. Influence of carbohydrate on serum caffeine concentrations following caffeine ingestion. J Sci Med Sport. 2012 Sep 7.

A Bitter Pill For Your Testes: Purported Health Supplement Bitter Melon Induces Oxidative Damage in Rat Testes and Reduces Testosterone Levels by >50%

Image 1: Momordica charantia, also known as
Bitter melon - just in case you haven't seen
this remarkable fruit yet. (photo FlyingToaster)
"Bitter Melon? That's in X, Y and Z. All products that are meant to improve your health. Well, Bitter Melon must be some good stuff then, no?" Right off the bat: No, it ain't "good stuff", but rather rat(-testes) poison!

In a recently published study, Yama, et al. (Yama. 2011) investigated the effect of 6-16 weeks of 50mg/kg (human equivalent: 8mg/kg) Momordica charantia (bitter melon) seed extract on testicular health of 90 male Sprague Dawley rats. Warning: The results of this study will probably make you throw up, if you just popped some bitter melon laden supplements:
The extract administered for 6, 8 and 16 weeks produced significantly (p < 0.05) increased testicular MDA [malondialdehyde is an accepted plasma marker for oxidative stress] (1.74 ± 1.15, 1.84 ± 0.38 and 2.38 ± 0.40) compared to control (0.38 ± 0.02, 0.38 ± 0.03 and 0.35 ± 0.02) and decreased AA [ascorbic acid content of the testes] (0.01± 0.02, 0.01± 0.01 and 0.00± 0.01) compared to control (0.15 ± 0.02, 0.12 ± 0.02 and 0.13 ± 0.02). There was also an associated significant decrease (p < 0.05) in peripheral [meaning in serum, not in testes exclusively] TT [total testosterone] levels compared to control.
Just to make that clear: Instead of helping with glucose management (bitter melon is a purported insulin-mimetic) and/or protecting your testes (its effect on glucose disposal aside, Momordica charantia is also promoted as a powerful antioxidant and respective effects have actually been established in diabetic rats, cf. Sathishsekar. 2005), your bitter melon laden super-supplement may be damaging your own, your boyfriend's or husband's best parts. Or as the scientists state it:
These findings suggest that the extract resulted in changes in the testicular oxidative status. This may play a role in testicular dysfunction that may compromise fertility.
The decrease in testicular ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) values, the scientists observed, would suggest that the addition of supplemental antioxidants (sounds crazy, doesn't it: supplementing a purported antioxidant supplement with antioxidants) could possible ameliorate the testicular damage. Yama et al. were yet able to show that even pre- or co-treatment with vitamin C and/or alpha.tocopherol (vitamin E), both antioxidants which are likely to be present in most commercially available antioxidant supplements containing (often among a dozen of other ingredients) bitter melon extracts, could not ameliorate the detrimental effects the Momordica charantia seed extract had on the reproductive organs of the rats.
Figure 1: Total Testosterone levels of male Sprague Dawley rats treated with distilled water or  50mg/kg bitter melon seed extract for 16 weeks (data adapted from Yama. 2011)
As it turns out (once again!), it always makes sense to look beyond the references a supplement producer is providing. Scientific as they may be (or sometimes just seem), they mostly tell you only the marketable part of the story (I also recommend you read an article my buddy Sean Casey wrote on "How to Evaluate Dietary Supplements").

Note: In defense of both the tropical and subtropical vine of the family Cucurbitaceae, as well as the supplement companies who have been using bitter melon in their products, it has to be said that an experiment done with a seed extract will tell you little about the effects of the fruit or a respective extract. Unfortunately many producers, such as ALRI with their amino acid product HumaPro, do not even list the source of the "Bitter Melon Fractional Extract" they include as part of what ALRI for example calls their "Proprietary Anti-catabolic and Insulingenic Matrix" [I dunno if you noticed, but ALRI even got the term "insulinogenic" misspelled, here ;].

Edit: Just in case you don't believe in the results this study, maybe the anti-androgen effect observed in the study (Girini. 2005), Rick P. dug up and posted in the comments below, gets your attention.

New "Gold Standard" For "Natural" Testosterone Boosting: 10x Increase in Plasma Testosterone After Subcutaneous Gold Chloride Injections in 2004 Rodent Study

Image 1: The world's first "all natural" test booster that is worth every penny... even if, just like the competition, it does not turn your muscles into granite hard stone ;-)
I guess, by now, it is an "open secret" that I am no particular fan of "natural test boosters", simply because the effect of these products on the revenue of their producers is usually several orders of magnitudes larger than their effect on the testosterone levels of their credulous customers. And while even the "product" today's blogpost is about has nothing but a single rodent study to back its efficacy, it certainly would be a valuable investment in these days of permanent financial crisis: gold! I honestly don't remember exactly how I happened onto this study, but the results are so extraordinary, that I thought it was worth a post despite the fact that it was originally published in 2004 and thusly does not qualify as part of "latest research" - after all, this would be the first test booster that would be worth its money, even if it did not work!

Gold chloride: The new gold-standard in natural testosterone boosting?

Over the course of a 26-day study period, N.M. Biswas and his colleagues from the Department of Physiology at the University College of Science and Technology in Calcutta India, injected a group of immature Wistar rats with 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg of gold chloride (46.7% pure gold!) per 1 ml sterile distilled water/kg body weight per day. The injections were subcutaneous, which - given the profound effects the procedure (cf. figure 1) - obviously did not hinder the gold choloride molecules from getting down to the testes (or working systemically from the brain?):
Figure 1: Body weight, testes weight, weight of seminal vesicle and prostate (left) and plasma testosterone levels after 26-days of subcutaneous injection with 0.3 and 0.5mg per 1 ml sterile distilled water/kg body weight per day of gold chloride per day (data adapted from Biswas. 2004)
As you can see in figure 1 (right) the increase in testosterone was literally "earth-shattering" - and in this case, this is still an understatement, I guess. If we assume that the corresponding +20% increase in Δ5-3β-HSD and 17β-HSD the scientists measured in the testes of the animals in the 0.5mg AuCl group, and considering the fact that both enzymes are regulated "centrally" via the release of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) from the pituitary gland, it appears reasonable to assume that the subcutaneous gold chloride injections exhibited central effects on the amplitude or pulsatile frequency of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone production in the hypothalamus, which would be in agreement with the morphological changes of the testes, about which the researchers write:
The weight of the testes and accessory sex organs are the other indicators of a possible alteration in androgen status. An increase in testicular weight in gold treated rats is possibly due to increased level of circulating testosterone, as androgen exerts its major role in sex organs. Testicular size and weight are normally regulated by fluid secretion from Sertoli cells and the production of sperm in the seminiferous tubules. The higher testicular weight in gold treated rats than the controls suggests less degeneration of germ and Sertoli cells that normally occur in immature rats.
This hypothesis in turn corresponds to the -41% reduction in degenerated step 7 spermatids (immature sperm that did not make it to the elongated, let alone the mature state) and the overall profoundly stimulated spermatogenesis in the immature rodents of the high dose gold chloride group.

Impressive results with a couple of non-negligible caveats

Yet, even if we disregard any potential risks, acknowledge the scientists' conclusion that "the beneficial effect of gold may play a significant role in the prevention of infertility" and interpreted the +18% increase in body weight in the high dose gold chloride group as experimental evidence that - contrary to your usual herbal testbooster - the profound effects of the subcutaneously injected gold chloride solution would actually produce visible increases in lean mass, I strongly advice against experimenting with this "ayurvedic panacea"! And that despite the fact that similar solutions are already used clinically as a treatment for rheumatoid arthritis and regardless of the results of a 2001 study by Sharma et al., which showed that subjects who ingested 2x100mg gold per day (orally) for 40 days did not show any symptoms of toxicity (Sharma. 2001).
Did you know that some of the ingredients of commercially available test boosters and other OTC supps, like piper longum, tinospora cardifolia, garcinia cambogia (HCA) or bulbine natalensis can induce testicular damage at high doses? If not, I suggest you go back to a SuppVersity post from 2010 and read up all the details on the results of a study by D'Cruz et al.: "Protect Your Testes! Beware of These Plants and Plant Products".
Aside from the health issues, the oral supplement regimen (at 200mg/day) would be pretty costly. At the current price of gold ~5$ per day... but hey, if you think about it, that money would probably still better spent than for a 30 months supply of any of the useless and partially likewise not very healthy (cf. red box above) herbal test booster. After all, you can just put the powder back into the box or wherever you store it and wait for the next stock market crash, the occurrence of which is - all pun intended - as safe as the Bank of England ;-)

Selenium, the Fertility Mineral!? Organic and Inorganic Selenium Ameliorate Reductions in Testosterone, Testicular Damage and Abnormalities in Sperm Quality in Obese Mice

Image 1: With enough selenium in vivo, "in vitro" (-fertilization) may not be necessary.
If you have not heard about it in one of my previous blogposts, you may probably heard about the antioxidant, pro-fertility effects of selenium in the context of Tim Ferris' "selenium experiment" in the 4-Hour-Body. Ferris claimed that by just eating a handful of Brazil nuts (544µg selenium per ounce) every day shot his testosterone levels and libido through the roof. Now, what most people probably overheard, though, was that Ferris was selenium deficient to begin with. Just as every bodybuilder's holy grail, zinc, selenium won't help up your testosterone or fertility if you have already plenty of the potentially toxic trace mineral in your diet. In view of its central role in the antioxidant defense system of our bodies, it is however likely that selenium requirements increase, whenever our bodies are exposed to increasing amounts of oxidative stress.

When your body fat sets your testicles on fire, selenium may come to a rescue...

One of the most common causes of increased oxidative stress, these days, are the increased levels in highly oxidizable very-low density cholesterol and triglyceride levels which appear to be an almost inevitable consequence of the "modern" lifestyle (=sitting on the couch and washing down your fast-food, as well as your low-fat "healthy" cereals, pasta and rice with soda). A recent study from scientists from the Institute of Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders of Domestic in China does now show that an adequate amount of dietary or supplemental selenium, which is, as you may gather from the data in table 1, pretty scarce in everything that was not grown or raised on selenium-rich soil, may not be able to reverse all negative side-effects, but could ameliorate them so that reproduction would still be possible (Ibrahim. 2011).

Table 1: Selenium content of common foods (based on data from the NIS. 2011)
While the basal diet, which had been enriched with cholesterol, lard and cholic acid, so that it would mimic the obesogenic high carb + high fat diet, researchers love to mislabel HFD (high fat diet), contained only 0.04 µg/g of selenium (without the addition the lard, i.e. for the control group, the se-content was 0.05µg/g), both the inorganic selenium HF-diet and the diet of the animals that received a combination of (organic) selenium (75% selenium-methionine) and probiotics (C. utilis and S. thermophilus strains) contained ~6x the amount of selenium (0.3µg/g chow). For humans this would translate to ~1.2µg/kg and 7µg/kg, respectively (since the scientists did not report food intake and body weight of the animals, I based this calculation on the respective data from other HFD feeding studies with mice).

Amelioration? Yes! Reversal / complete prevention? No!

After 75 days on control, high fat, high fat + probiotic only, high fat + inorganic selenium only, and high fat + 90% organic selenium + probiotic diets, the testis of the mice showed histopathological changes even a non-expert as I am one would identify as "probably not healthy" (cf. illustration 1):
Illustration 1: Compilation of the histopathological examination of murine testes (H & E, ×400; based on Ibrahim. 2011)
The evident degenerations, decreases in cell population, and irregularities went hand in hand with a pretty profound changes in the quality of sperm (cf. figure 1), which were ameliorated, yet not prevented in the selenium and selenium + probiotic groups.
Figure 1: Measures of sperm quality - sperm count and motility (left); relative incidence of sperm with abnormal heads and tails (right; data based on Ibrahim. 2011)
In that, it is noteworthy that the selenium + probiotic (SePro) group had an only 1.5x increased amount of sperm with abnormal tails. The latter can thusly hardly be the reason for the -20% reduction in overall sperm motility.
Figure 2: Lipid (left axes) and testosterone (right axes) levels in the different groups (left); HDL to total cholesterol ratio and change in testosterone levels compared to control (right; data calculated based on Ibrahim. 2011)
In view of the fact that the male gonads do not only produce sperm, but also testosterone, it is not surprising that selenium and selenium + probiotic supplementation had a similar ameliorative effect on the diet induced reduction -47% reduction in testosterone (cf. figure 2). The +3% increase in serum testosterone (over the obesogenic diet group) in the probiotic only group, on the other hand, lacked statistical significance.
Image 2: The importance of selenium for thyroid function, specifically the local conversion of the "inactive" T4 to the "active" T3 is not the only reason why women should try to achieve adequate selenium intakes, as well.
Selenium for women? While it appears that research has hitherto focused on the role selenium plays in male health, there is a handful of studies which suggest that adequate levels are just as important for women, as they are for men. The results of a Polish study from 2006, for example, stand in line with the, as of late, controversial anti-carcinogenic effect selenium is supposed to have on prostate cancer. According to the authors, the provision of selenium supplements to women with a genetic disposition for breast and ovarian cancer led to a small, but statistical significant reduction in cancer rates (Huzarski. 2006). In 2009, Hermsdorff et al. observed a statistical significant inverse correlation between selenium intake and serum levels of retinol-binding-protein 4, a marker of whole body inflammation and purported contributer to insulin resistance and diabetes (Yang. 2005), in 74 young (~20y) healthy women (Hermsdorff. 2009). In post-menopausal women, Llaneza et al. found a non-negligible association of low-serum selenium levels and higher LDLc and triglyceride levels (Llaneza. 2009). A 2007 study by Negro et al. underlines the particular importance of adequate selenium levels for thyroid health during and immediately after pregnancy (Negro. 2007). And according to a recent review of the role of selenium in reproductive health, low selenium levels in the follicular fluid are a characteristic feature of "unexplained infertility" in women.
As far as the "potency" of the probiotics is concerned, the study was thusly quite disappointing. That the scientists who were proud to have developed a "Se-enriched probiotic as a new feed additive product for promoting animal industries" do not explicitly state that, is understandable, but won't stop me to repeat my previous recommendation to just add a handful of brazil nuts to your diet on a regular basis to make sure you satisfy your selenium requirements.

Selenium intoxication from Brazil nuts? I don't think so...

Image 3: Eating lots of brazil nuts and other selenium rich foods until they achieve what the US consider "toxic" serum and plasma levels does not seem to impair the health of the inhabitants of the regions around the Tapajós River in Brazil - on the contrary, their cardiovascular health is outstanding (Lemire. 2011)
That this practice is not going to result in selenium toxicity has, by the way, been shown only very recently in one of those studies that analyze traditional diets, which have become so in-vogue, as of late. Lemire et al., who analyzed blood (B-Se) and plasma (P-Se) samples from members of the communities which live along the Tapajós River in Brazil, did not only find that these people had selenium levels well beyond what is "considered toxic" in the US, they also state that their results "support the need to re-assess Se toxicity considering factors such as the chemical form of Se exposure, route of exposure (inhaled versus ingested), co-exposures to toxic elements such as mercury" and hint at "a possible association between high Se status and cardiometabolic health in this study population." (Lemire. 2011) So, men or woman, fertile or infertile, fat or lean... you better make sure you get your share of brazil nuts, today ;-)

+76% Testosterone & Protection From Insane Amounts of EMR With Rosmarinic Acid from O. Basilicum, Majoram, Thyme and Several Other Herbs in Your Kitchen Cabinet

Figure 1: O. basilicum extract was the rosmarinic acid (RA) source that was used in the study at hand; other common herbs which contain RA include rosemary (who would have guessed that ;-), Spanish sage, lavender, perilla and lemon balm, majoram, thyme and mint
That I am not a fan of testosterone boosters is probably an "open secret"... specifically in terms of "scientifically proven" ones, without any human data to back their claims and a single rodent study published in the African Journal of Pharmacology to back claims that like "increases lean mass" or "helps you shed body fat" that would not be supported by the study data, anyways... so, just to make sure that you, as a faithful student of the SuppVersity are the first to know about the (I bet) soon to be released "scientifically proven" testosterone booster, I decided to share with you the results of... exactly, one of those rodent studies from the January issue of the African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology (Khaki. 2012), which would actually not have made it into the news, if it were not for the "ivory tower dose" of EMR the scientists used in this study.
Note: I do not intend to challenge the credibility of this journal or the authors of this study, but I do want to point out that studies into the beneficial effects of "polyphenols" on whatever biological functions do not get published in the influential journals for a good reason: Almost every herb, and I suppose there are millions, will show some sort of anti-oxidant and I would venture the guess, at the right dose, testosterone boosting or inhibiting effects. For the first 1 1/2 months of 2012, the estimated number of papers reporting novel or summarizing old findings on those natural-antioxidants is >1,400 (according to Google Scholar)... so, chances that the next best herb that is growing just before your door is a "potent antioxidant" (at high enough doses) is ~50%, with another 50% chance of associated increases in testosterone, 25% of all herbs are potential testosterone boosters and "scientifically proven" (at least, in supp-company terms) as soon as a single paper with respective data is published.
I guess, now that we have put things in perspective, I can say the magic words that will usually elicit commentaries à la "Where can I get this stuff on the net?" within the next 24h in either the comment area of the respective blogpost or on the SuppVersity's Facebook wall - ready? Then let's go: Treating male Wistar rats with 5mg/kg Rosmaric acid (RA), a polyphenol from herbal plants from the Lamiaceae family, for 40 days increased their total testosterone levels from 1.7 to 2.99ng/ml (+76%)...
Figure 1: Effects of 40-day treatment with unrealistically high amounts of EMR from 80G EMF (50hz), 5mg/kg rosmaric acid from 1.5g/kg O basilico or a combination of both on endocrine function in male Wistar rats (data calculated based on Khaki. 2012)
So, just in case you did not already run to your local GNC to ask the guy/girl at the counter, whether they have rosmaric acid in stock, you may as well be interested to see that the same 5mg/kg RA the rats received in the form of 1.5g/kg body weight O. basilicum extract (you see, you don't even have to go to your GNC for you daily dose of test-boosting herbs ;-) also blunted the -41% reduction in testosterone (cf. figure 1)the scientists induced by exposing the rats to EMF radiation at a completely unrealistic level of 80G - this is way more than 8,000x of what one of those stone-age microwave ovens emits, and another reason why studies like that don't get published in reputable journals.
Figure 2: Intact spermatogonia and spermatocytes in testis of untreated control and after 40-day treatment with unrealistically high amounts of EMR from 80G EMF (50hz), 5mg/kg rosmaric acid from 1.5g/kg O basilico (data calculated based on Khaki. 2012)
In view of the fact that the highest real-world 24h EMF exposure at 50Hz, I could think of would be right beneath a high-voltage powerline, which emits <150mG and thusly still 533x less than the EMF emitting device in the study, at hand, it is highly questionable, how significant the actual data on sperm and testis morphology in the EMF and RA + EMF groups actually is (cf. figure 2). The reason I still included it in this post, is that RA alone led to statistically non-significant, but still measurable improvement in sperm morphology, which could, after all, make the difference for any couple unable to conceive.

This testbooster should already be in your kitchen cabinet, so no reason to go to GNC

If we discard the questionable data on the exorbitant EMF exposure, this study leaves us with yet another "scientifically proven" testosterone booster, the real advantage of which is that it is naturally present not only in O. basilico, an extract of which was used in this study at a human equivalent dose of 243mg/kg body weight, but also in rosemary (who would have guessed that ;-), Spanish sage, lavender, perilla and lemon balm, majoram, thyme and mint - in other words, all those herbs you should have in your kitchen cabinet, anyway. After all, rosmarinic acid has anti-carcinogenic (Vencatachalam. 2012; Encalada. 2012), neuroprotective (Wang. 2012), anti-... ah, just the same effects as about every other polyphenol at the right dose - and did I mention that it is yet another caffeic acid derivate (cf. Caffeic Acid, AMPK and the Weight Loss Effects of Coffee)?