.

.
marylin monroe
Showing posts with label chest. Show all posts
Showing posts with label chest. Show all posts

"Inner Chest", "Upper Abs", "Biceps Peak" & Co!? Study Finds Proximal and Distal Part of the Triceps Grow Independently and According to Training Stimulus.

Image 1: Training for the peak, could it be possible, after all? (image from provitamin.in)
You probably have read my repeated notes on the issue of training individual muscles fibers in complete isolation in the 7-part SuppVersity EMG-Series. I guess in view of the results of a very recent study from the Faculty of Sports Sciences at the Waseda University in Japan (Wakahara. 2011), it might be that I will have to revise my statement. It could in fact be that you can train a specific part of a muscle fiber - if not individually, then at least predominantly.

Despite the fact that our movements are always orchestrated by the interplay of a whole host of muscle-groups and -fibers, Wakahara et al.'s results suggest that it may even be possible to target specific parts of individual fibers by selecting the correct exercises. In other words, instead of doing incline bench presses for the upper chest, you could, as many trainers recommend it for years do them with a narrower grip to target the "inner chest", i.e. the inner part of the same muscle fiber that constitutes the "outer chest" (note that this is fundamentally different from training "upper pecs" and "lower pecs", which are in fact separate muscle strands).

The muscle group for which Taku Wakahara and his colleagues were able to show this remarkable effect, was yet not the chest, but the triceps brachii. For their study, the scientists recruited 2x12 healthy young men (25.2 +/- 3.0 years, 172.8 +/- 5.0 cm, 65.3 +/- 7.8 kg; there were 7 dropouts of 19 men who started the 12-week resistance training), who had not participated in a regular resistance training program for the upper extremities for at least 6 months, for a short (single session) and long term (12 weeks) analysis of the effects of DB lying triceps extension on muscular activation and hypertrophy in the triceps brachii.

In the first experiment the scientists had one group of subjects perform 5 sets of 8 repetitions with a 2s concentric and a 2s eccentric phase at 80% of their previously established 1RM-max.

Before and immediately after the resistance exercise, T2-weighted MR images of the upper arm were obtained with an MR scanner [...] The time from completion of the exercise to initiation of the scanning was 72 +/- 21 s. In each MR image, the outline of the triceps brachii muscle was traced to determine the CSA using a software package (Image J, National Institute of Health, USA).
In view of the short timespan between the last set of the exercise and the MR scans, we may safely assume, that the CSA (cross-sectional area) increases the scientists measured in this first session were mainly a result of the increased blood-flow to the triceps aka "the pump". For me, this is particularly interesting, because if those areas of the muscles with the "greatest pump", i.e. the greatest increase in CSA immediately after training, would be identical with those areas of the muscle which exhibit the greatest hypertrophy in the course of the 12-week follow-up experiment, this would be evidence for the significance of increased blood flow and "the pump" in view of consecutive muscle growth (it would not, however tell us whether the relation between "the pump" and muscular hypertrophy is corollary or causative!).
Figure 1: Increases in cross-sectional area of the triceps brachii immediately after a single session of DB lying triceps extensions and a 12-week resistance training protocoll (data calculated based on Wakahara. 2011)
As the data I plotted in figure 1 goes to show, there is a correlation (R²=0.67) between the CSA increases after the single session and the hypertrophy response to the 3x a week (12 weeks) training regimen. The correlation is too weak to confirm Arnold Schwarzenegger's advice that "going for the pump" would be the (implying "one and only) way to grow. This, however, does not diminish the importance of Wakahara et al.'s finding that
the region-specific muscle hypertrophy after chronic resistance training is attributable to the regional difference in muscle activation during the exercise
In other words, the bros at the gym were probably right, there are inner chest, outer chest, biceps peak, upper quads etc. and you can probably train them individually.

In view of the costs of the necessary equipment, it is however not very likely that you will see a "SuppVersity Magneto-Resonance Series" with the "very best exercises for individual parts of each and every muscle fiber as determined by increases in CSA after a single training session" somewhere in the near future. But guess what, in the end you would not even need that if you rely on your own good judgement: If you exercise with heavy weights and proper form, the pump, the burn and the soreness after the workout will tell you if it was the inner chest, or the outer chest that took over the lion's share of your last workout.

Adelfo Cerame: Training Day - Chest + Shoulders + Triceps! Includes Complete Workout Video + Exercise Descriptions

Image 1: You've waited long enough, now it's there Adelfo's latest training video!
I guess after seeing the "Meat-Ology: A Brief Glance at the Latest Data on The Link Between Red Meat, Cooking Techniques & Prostate Cancer" post you will have thought that you will never get to see how Adelfo Cerame Jr tears down the gym, right? Well, take today's earlier news as a SuppVersity Special and this as the promised regular post for today, Friday August 17, 2012. You probably won't mind that there is not so much text in today's installment of Adelfo's otherwise Thursdaily blogposts. After all the details on why Adelfo, who is as you all know a huge proponent of red meat may after all still get away without prostate cancer - even if he prepares his lean pork in a pan... but hey, you've been waiting for more than 2 weeks now, so let's finally get into this workout.

Training Day! Chest + Shoulders + Triceps

It’s a little delayed but here are the training videos I promised two weeks ago. I know I mentioned showing you guys 2-3 videos of some new exercises I learned from fellow Myotropics teammate Eric Minor when picking his brain at the USA’s (cf. "Back From Vegas"), but I decided What the heck! Why not take them through my whole workout.  The downside to that is that I wasn’t able to get video footage of each and every set, because I do have 2 other guys I train with, so I don’t want all the video taking to cut into our training but I was able to get footage of at least one set of every exercise that I did yesterday. Here’s how a Thursday workout plan for me looks like:
ExerciseSets x Reps
DB flat press + (superset) BB flat press4 x 12 / 6-8
DB incline press + (superset) BB incline press4 x 12 / 6-8
Decline press (hammer strength)4 x 12
Pec deck flys3 x 12-15
DB shoulder press + (superset) DB lateral raise4 x 12/ 8-12
DB front raise4 x 12 / 8-12
Champagne tilts3 x 12+ / 8-12
Triceps pull down3 x 12-15
Table 1: Adelfo Cerame Jr's high volume Chest workout (includes Shoulders + Tris)
My Thursday and Friday training are my higher volume days, so yesterday was my high volume day for chest, shoulders and triceps. Here is video footage (click on the image to watch) of each individual exercise, just so you guys can get an idea of how a days training looks like for me ;-)
DB to BB Superset Flat Presses

4 sets of 12 on DB presses +
4 sets of 6-8 on BB presses

This is an exercise that I started applying into my training after talking to Eric Minor, when I was picking his brain and asking for a couple tips and pointers. It’s very hard for me to get a good pump in my chest especially on a BB bench press. The only time I really use the BB flat press is on my heavy days just for strength, but I never use it on my higher volume days, because it just feels like I’m working my shoulders – but ever since I started super setting flat DB presses to flat BB presses, I’ve been really feeling my chest blowing up during the workouts.
DB to BB Superset Incline Presses
4 sets of 12 on DB presses +
4 sets of 6-8 on BB presses

Same protocol as the flat presses, yet with a minor twist in the way I hold the dumbbells. Rather than your typical DB incline press grip, I prefer the incline close grip presses with a neutral grip; I feel that it stimulates my upper chest much better, and I get a real good pump.

Decline Presses on Hammer Strength Machine
4 sets of 12
 
No supersets here. *Lol* I couldn’t think of anything creative where I can quickly transition over to another exercise.

Pec Dec Flys
 
3 sets of 12-15

Last chest exercise before I start on my shoulders. After all the compound movements, I usually like to end my chest work outs with flys.

DB Shoulder Press Superset With
DB Lateral Raises
4 sets of 12 on DB shoulder presses +
4 sets of 8-12 on DB lateral raises

Aside from BB jammer presses, this is another one of my favorite exercise for shoulders.


Champagne Tilts followed by
Triceps pull downs
3 sets of 12 and 3 sets of 12-15

Like most, I like to end my chest and shoulder workouts with triceps – the reason is obvious, it's the synergy with chest and shoulders.

DB Front Raises
3 set of 10-12

I wasn’t really much of a fan of doing isolated front delt exercises – to be honest; I felt that my front delts got enough stimulation when I do my chest and shoulder compound movements, so I didn’t really bother much with front raises. When talking to Eric at the USA’s I mentioned this to him and he showed me a different variation of front raises that really stimulated my front delts – the secret is the slight bend in the elbows while you re doing a slightly inverted raise - at least for me this exercise hits my front delts real nice.
Well that’s all I got for today SuppVersity readers, I hope you enjoyed the videos. I have back day today, so I’ll try to get footage of my whole workout just like I did, yesterday.

Also, feel free to send requests if you’d like to see how I adapt and adjust to other exercises that you may be curious about and don't forget to come back next week for an update on my upcoming experiment with 5/3/1 training – I’m actually going to have to max out this Saturday in order to figure out my lifting percentages, so I will be trading in my 5x5 training as I try to play with the 5/3/1 training for a couple weeks.

SuppVersity EMG Series - Latissimus, Trapezius & More: The Very Best Exercises for Back Width & Thickness

Image 1: The major muscle groups
of the back - trapezius (red)
and latissimus dorsi (green)
In this issue of the SuppVersity EMG Series, we are going to tackle three instead of one muscle groups, ...
  • the trapezius (image 1, red) and the rhomboidei (image 1, blue), of which the former, i.e. the "traps", which covers the rhomboids that connect the scapula with the vertebrae of the spinal column, is often erroneously associated with the musculature of the neck; in effect, the m. trapezius extends longitudinally from the occipital bone to the lower thoracic vertebrae and laterally to the spine of the scapula and is thus responsible for what pro-bodybuilders often refer to as back thickness and ...
  • the latissimus dorsi (image 1, green), which literally is the 'broadest muscle of the back' and thus responsible for back width.
The reasons we will be addressing back width and thickness in a single issue are twofold: Firstly, you need to train all muscle groups of the upper/mid back if you want to develop a strong and visually impressive frame*.
*Note: In fact you have to train your lower back, particularly the erector spinae, as well, but since tackling all the four of them would have gone beyond the scope of one installment of the SuppVersity EMG Series, I decided to address abs and lower back together in an upcoming "core training" issue of this series.
And secondly, you cannot really isolate one from the other, because your body was not designed to look aesthetically appealing (whatever your interpretation of this may be), but it was made for optimal functional strength and agility and thus ultimately for survival. Consequently, the muscles of your back (even more so than it is the case with other body parts) will always work in concert, when you climb, pull, snatch or just carry heavy objects around your house or garden. Keep that in mind, when you read about training for "width" vs. training for "size" (even in this summary)... synergy is the name of the game and you would not want huge "wings" (meaning a broad back) on a frame that is as flat as a pancake, anyway - would you?
ChestBicepsBackCoreLegsTricepsShoulders
Navigate the SuppVersity EMG Series - Click on the desired body part to see the optimal exercises.
But enough of that, let's get to the meat and potatoes of EMG optimized back-training. Here they are, the most effective exercises for m. trapezius and m. latissimus dorsi, as measured by electromyography (10 male resistance-trained subjects, mean age 22y, mean body-fat 13%; data from Boeckh-Behrens & Buskies. 2000)...

I. The Latissmus Dorsi - Grow Yourself a Pair of Wings Exercises with standard equipment for the m. latissimus dorsi
  1. Lat pulldown to sternum (PS1), narrow underhand grip, bend back
  2. Lat pulldown to neck (PN), shoulder-wide overhand grip, upright
  3. DB row, bend over (DB1), underhand grip, arms close to torso, palms to the front
  4. Lat pulldown to sternum (PS2), shoulder-wide overhand grip, bend back
  5. DB row, bend over (DB2), neutral grip, palms facing torso
  6. Lat pulldown to sternum (PS3), shoulder-wide overhand grip, upright
  7. Seated cable row (CR), V-Bar, arms close to torso
Figure 1: EMG activity of exercises with standard equipment expressed relative to lat pulldowns to the neck (PN); the abbreviations can be found in the ranking above (data calculated based on Boeckh-Behrens & Buskies. 2000)
The visual representation of the EMG activity relative to what was long considered the "meat and potatoes" of machine-based lat-training, the pulldown to the neck (PN), shows that the classic exercises, Joe Weider already recommended, i.e. the lat pulldown to the chest/sternum (PS1) and to the neck (PN) actually result in the greatest activation of the dorso-lateral muscle on the trunk, but other than the Canadian co-founder of the International Federation of BodyBuilders (IFBB) thought, Boeckh-Behrens & Buskies found no significant difference in the activation of the upper, middle and lower part of the latissimus dorsi between the different pulldown varieties. In other words, it is not possible to train the upper, middle or lower part of the broad back muscle (latissimus dorsi) in isolation.
Always remember! The m. latissimus dorsi is no exception to the rule that you cannot isolate individual muscle fibers from a single muscle group. The same is true for the "upper and lower abs" and the "upper lower and middle parts of the chest", which will always work in conjunction, whenever you do your situps, leg raises, push ups and bench presses. In this context it is also worth mentioning that, at least to a certain degree, all pulling movements activate the m. biceps brachialis (biceps), the m. deltoideus, pars spinalis (rear delts) and the m. trapezius, pars transversa (middle part of the traps), as well.
Image 2: Leaning back slightly
(135° vs. 180°) increases the activation
of the m. latissimus dorsi by 11%!
Another interesting conclusion you can draw from the data in figure 1 is that, other than many gurus would have it, leaning back or as some may call it "cheating" on lat pulldowns is actually beneficial as far as the activation of the broad back muscle is concerned (as long as it is done without momentum!). Compared to the textbook version of the lat-pull (PS3), which would be executed sitting 100% straight, so that your arms and your torso are and remain perpendicular to the floor, bending slightly back (PS1; 135° vs. 180°, cf. image 1) increases the muscular activation of the m. latissimus dorsi by 11%. In a similar vein, the derided underhand grip dumbbell row (DB1), which is supposed to turn the bend over dumbbell row into a biceps exercise effectively increases the activation of the lats by 6%, as long as it is executed with appropriate form, i.e. with the arm tucked into the side of your body (don't let your arms flare to handle bigger weights, guys!).
Note: Although the angle between your arms and your torso (tucked in vs. flared out) does affect the intensity of the exercise, it is not as crucial as you may have thought. Flairing your arms to a 45° angle during a V-bar cable row, for example decreases the activation of the lats by less than -1%! A 90° abduction, on the other hand, decreases the EMG activity by -49% and would thus effectively turn a 'lat' into a 'rear delt' exercise.
 
Image 3: Wide grip pull up to
the neck, still the number one
body weight exercise for lat
development (bodytrainer.tv)
Bodyweight exercises for the m. latissimus dorsi
  1. Pull up to neck, wide overhand grip
  2. Pull up to sternum, wide underhand grip
  3. Pull up to sternum, wide overhand grip
  4. Pull up to sternum, narrow overhand grip
As you can see the good old, but for some painful wide grip pull up to the neck (if you asked me a very unnatural movement) does still provide the greatest lat activation.
    Figure 2: EMG activity of variations of the pull up to the sternum expressed relative to wide grip pull ups to the neck (data calculated based on Boeckh-Behrens & Buskies. 2000)
    Moreover, it is interesting that pull ups done using a wide underhand grip and not pull ups with an overhand grip, as most trainees probably think, come in second (-13% and -19% less EMG activity vs. pull ups to the neck). A narrow grip, on the other hand takes away much of the activity in the lat muscle, if nothing else, then due to the lower weight that can be used.
    Training tip! If you cannot do the "classical" pull up to the neck, because your shoulder, neck or whatever starts hurting, find yourself one of those pull-up-towers, which usually have handles without a bar in between. If you are lucky you can push down the weight that would usually assist you, so that you do can to regular pull ups, but will not have to bend your head forward, as your head travels freely, where usually the bar would block your way (make sure, though, not to lean back too much, because otherwise you would be doing a pull up to the sternum, anyway).


    I. The Trapezius & the Rhomboidei - Adding a Thick Roadmad to Your Backside

    A note on the rhomboid muscles: All exercises that activate the m trapezius will inevitable target the underlying m. rhomboidei, as well. This circumstance and the impracticality of measuring muscle activity in a muscle that cannot be accessed without surgical intervention (remember the m. rhomboidei are covered by the m. trapezius) prompted Boeckh-Behrens & Buskies decision not to measure the EMG activity of the rhomboid muscles individually.

    Exercises with standard equipment for ...* indicates a reference exercise to which the others were compared in figure 3  ^ indicates that the exact EMG value for this exercise has not been measured / not measured with the same subject group ° if not stated otherwise the given angles denote the angle between arm and torso

    ...the upper part of the m. trapezius
    1. DB shrug*
    2. BB front raise, narrow grip
    3. Deadlift ^
      ...the middle part of the m. trapezius
    1. Machine rev. fly (int. rotation, 90°)
    2. DB reverse fly (90°)*
    3. BB bend over row (90°)
    4. Straight bar cable rows
    5. Face pulls 
    6. DB row (90°)*
    ...the lower part of the m. trapezius
    1. Machine rev. fly (ext. rotation 120°)
    2. DB reverse fly (120°)*^
    3. Machine rev. fly (ext. rotation 90°)
    4. Shoulder pulls, on lat pull down
    5. DB reverse fly (90°)
    6. Machine reverse fly (int. rotation 90°)
    Image 4: This is the machine the subjects in the study used to perform the internally rotated reverse fly on; notice the 90° angle of arms and torso (photo menshealth.de)
    Figure 2: EMG activity of various back exercises for the upper, lower and middle part of the m. trapezius; values are expressed relative to exercises tagged with an asterisk (*) for the respective part of m(data calculated based on Boeckh-Behrens & Buskies. 2000)
    Although they did not explicitly measure the EMG activity for the deadlift, the authors speculate that "in view of the anatomical function of the muscle and the huge leverages, the [deadlift] is likely to be highly effective". That being said, neither the names nor the ranking of the top 3 exercises for the upper part of the m. trapezius should surprise you. These exercises are and have always been the meat and potatoes of back training regimens, although they are sometimes mislabeled as neck or shoulder exercises. Isolating the individial parts of the m. trapezius With regard to the superior activation of the middle part of the m. trapezius by the machine based reverse fly vs. its free weight equivalent, the reverse dumbbell fly, I would like to draw your attention to image 4, which shows a similar piece of equipment as the one that was used in the study. Other than the free-weight variety the machine based reverse fly takes both, the momentum, as well as the contribution of triceps / arm out of the equation and is thus an ideal isolation movement.
    Note: Although, Boeckh-Behrens and Buskies did not measure that explicitly, it is very likely that the activation of the m. trapezius would be lower on one of those machines, where you pull with your hands instead of pushing the pads back with the back of your upper arms.
    Image 4: Shoulder pulls,
    an exercise that is often
    used as part of rehabilitation
    programs
    A simple change in the angle between your arms and your torso from 90° to 110° switches the focus of both the free weight, as well as the machine based exercise towards the lower part of the traps. An ideal isolation exercise that will also help with posture and the prevention of the dreaded "impingement syndrome", where the tendons of the rotator cuff muscles become irritated and inflamed as they pass through the subacromial space, the passage beneath the acromion, is the shoulder pull on a standard lat pulldown machine, where, instead of pulling with your lats (and arms) your arms stay extended throughout the movement and you move the weight exclusively with the muscles you would use if someone asked you to pull your shoulder-blades back and downwards (cf. figure 4). While it is no common exercise in a bodybuilding regimen, incorporation of effective rehab exercises like this can help injury prevention and - who knows - help you draw the last "roads" of the roadmap onto an otherwise perfectly built back.  

    Body weight exercises for the lower part of the m. trapezius
    1. Dips
    2. Pull up to sternum, wide overhand grip
    You probably will be surprised to see the dips as the top body weight exercise to develop the lower part of your m. trapezius. If you don't believe the EMG data, try doing some diips after an exhaustive back workout with heavy trap-involvement, but watch out, you could easily get hurt, when your traps cannot stabilize your body anymore...
    Training tip: Although many trainees fail to realize it, the back is probably the muscle group that is most difficult to train, or I should say, to stimulate adequately. Make sure you use a weight that is so heavy that you really struggle lifting it off the ground / pulling it up, but always make sure it is not so heavy that you cannot control it on its way back down. If your muscles cannot stop the weight on its way down before your tendons do, the weight is too heavy. Leave your ego at the door, grab a lighter weight and work the muscle, not the cartilage. Pulling, squeezing and struggling synergistically pave the way to injury free back development.
    In summary, while almost all back exercises will activate both, the m. latissimus dorsi (back width) and the m. trapezius and the subjacent rhomboidei to some degree, only a combination of the most effective lat exercises, which are the wide grip overhand pull up to the neck and the wide grip underhand pull down to the sternum with the best exercises for the upper, middle and lower traps, which are heavy dumbbell shrugs and reverse flies using both a 90° and a 110° angle will maximally stimulate all muscle groups of your back.  

    An EMG-optimized routine There is of course a myriad of ways of combining the individual exercises, my personal recommendation for impressive back development (based on EMG data) would yet be as follows:

    Image 5: There are exercises that would
    have to bee invented, if they had not been
    there sincethe early days of physical culture.
    The DB shrug, as the one and only "Governator",
    Mr Universe & Olympia, Mr.  IFBB International,
    ... you name it,  Arnold Schwarzenegger performs
    them on this photo, certainly is one of them.
    1. Pull ups to the neck - for lat development + all those hidden stabilizing muscles a full body movement such as the pull up activates (5-10 reps / use additional weight or rest-pause if you can do more / less)
    2. Narrow underhand grip pull-down to the sternum (in contracted position pull elbows back as much as possible) - to fully exhaust the lats (8-12 reps)
    3. DB shrugs (use peak contractions) - for upper trap development (10-12 reps) Super Set = go from 4 to 5 without rest, rest after 5, repeat
    4. Reverse fly 90° (preferably on a machine like the one in image 4) - for mid trap development (10-12 reps)
    5. DB reverse fly 110° (use light weights, feel the burn!) - for lower trap development (do to failure, up the weight if you can do 15+)
    You may notice that I do not make volume (i.e. set) recommendations. This is due to the fact that I found that everyone has to find what works best for him / her in terms of optimal volume and training frequency. This may also change over time / according to lifestyle factors / nutrition and supplementation.

    SuppVersity EMG Series - Musculus Pectoralis Major: The Very Best Exercises for a Chiseled Chest

    Image 1: The pectoralis major.
    (Avandäre:Chrizz @ Wikipedia)
    I don't know about you, but about everyone I know (myself included) has, at some point in his/her life, dwelled on thoughts somewhere on the continuum from "Damn, my chest looks flabby!" to "Hell, I got a chest like a chicken". In case you didn't this column probably won't interest you. Otherwise I highly suggest that you read on to learn about the most effective exercises, as measured by electromyography (10 male resistance-trained subjects, mean age 22y, mean body-fat 13%; data from Boeckh-Behrens & Buskies. 2000)...

    Exercises with standard equipment
    1. Bench Presses (barbell)
    2. Cable Cross*
    3. Bench Presses (dumbbell)
    4. Butterfly Mashine
    5. Flys (dumbbell)
    6. Pullovers
    * the cable cross exercise should be performed actually crossing one's arms low before your body

    Figure 1: Degree of muscle activation in comparison to reference exercise barbell pench press; median rank R of exercise among for all participants (data adapted from Boeckh-Behrens & Buskies. 2000)
    Notice the interpersonal variety in exercise effectiveness for the Butterfly Machine and the Dumbbell Bench Press. While the mean EMG activation was higher for the Butterfly, the average rank, indicative of how beneficial the exercise is compared to other exercises for each subject on an individual level, is lower. This is a tell tale sign that the perfect match of the ergometry of the Butterfly Machine and the individual physique of the subjects, as well as the exercise form during free weight movements are major determinants of the effectiveness of a given exercise.

    Body weight movements  **
    1. Dips
    2. Pushups
    3. Flexing the pectoralis in a fly-like position
    ** a comparison of weighed and body weight movements using EMG measurements would not be fair, because muscular activation increases with load and the load would be constant and, for advanced trainees, low (relative to their strength) in body weight only exercises
    Image 2: Different parts of the pectoralis major
    pars clavicularis (1), pars sterocostalis (2),
    pars abdominialis (3) (image from DocMartin)

    Targeting the individual parts
    • pars clavicularis: descending fibers (upper part)
    • pars sternocostalis: lateral fibers (middle part)
    • pars abdominialis: ascending fibers (lower part)
    While there are no "upper" and "lower" chest muscles, its a physiomechanical matter of course that different exercise and working angles will stress ascending, descending and lateral fibers to a different degree. So, while it may be impossible to isolate certain fiber strands, it is well possible to shift the main workload from one strand to the other by selecting appropriate exercises.
    Figure 2: EMG activation of different areas of the chest muscle (cf. numbers in image 2) by the bench press exercise at different inclines (data adapted from Boeckh-Behrens & Buskies. 2000)
    At first, it may look strange that the inverse(=decline) bench press exhibits the greatest EMG activity not only for the lower chest (as bro-science) would have it, but also for the upper chest. If you do however remind yourself that EMG activity corresponds to the number of motor neurons firing in the area under the electrode, than it is quite obvious that the larger load the subjects were able to handle on the inverse(=decline) bench press resulted in increased motor neuron activation and thus greater EMG values.
    Figure 3: Relative activation of different areas of the chest muscle (cf. numbers in image 2) compared to mean activation for each bench press variety (data calculated from Boeckh-Behrens & Buskies. 2000)
    I have compensated for this problem by calculating the relative increase in activation compared to the mean activation across the whole chest muscle for each exercise and plotted the data in figure 3. I suspect, this looks much more the way you expected it, doesn't it? Relative to the mean activation pattern over the whole pectoralis muscle, the incline bench press with an angle of +45° provides a 69% more intense stimulation to the "upper chest".

    In summary, the inverse(=decline) bench press is the most effective exercise for the pectoralis major as a whole. The incline bench press (+45°), on the other hand, isolates the upper part of the chest muscle, i.e. the descending fibers of the pars clavicularis (cf. image 1) optimally and will thus - as bro-science tells you - bring up your " pecs".


    ChestBicepsBackCoreLegsTricepsShoulders
    Navigate the SuppVersity EMG Series - Click on the desired body part to see the optimal exercises.

    Image 3: Other than bro-science tells you,
    EMG measurements show that the main
    difference in grip width is not triceps activation,
    but a greater involvement of the "upper pecs"
    with a closer to shoulder-wide grip
    (image from QuakeFitness.com)

    An EMG-optimized routine

    There is of course a myriad of ways of combining the individual exercises, my personal recommendation for overall chest development (based on EMG measures) would yet be as follows

    1. Decline Bench Press (BB) - for overall chest development + strength (5-10 reps)
    2. Incline Bench Press at +45° (DB) - to emphasize upper chest (8-12 reps)
    3. Cable Cross (making sure to actually cross the cables before your torso) - to get a stretch and peak contractions (12-15 reps)
    4. Bodyweight dips - to wear the muscle out (3 sets to failure)
    You may notice that I do not make volume (i.e. set) recommendations. This is due to the fact that I found that everyone has to find what works best for him / her in terms of optimal volume and training frequency. This may also change over time / according to lifestyle factors / nutrition and supplementation.

    Want to Design a Killer Workout? Reduce the Rest Times and Burn 37% More Energy During Your Workout!

    The squat may be a power exercise, but trust me, it will also help you to "look good naked"!
    I guess it would be hilarious to call the simple insight that cutting the time you rest in-between sets during your squats can turn a regular into a killer workout would be news, right? Well, what about some figures to define "killer" as in one minute rest between sets vs. "regular" as in three minutes rest between sets squats, then? That's news, right; and we have to thank Nicholas A. Ratamess and his colleagues from the College of New Jersey for these insights.

    I mean, huffing and puffing is one thing, but your subjectively perceived level of exhaustion and the very concrete, objectively measured data on the difference in energy expenditure and the contribution of aerobic (fat) and anaerobic (glucose) energy sources during a workout, as they are presented in the paper at hand, are two different animals.
    Squatting will always remain the most versatile muscle builder & fat shredder

    Optimizing Rest for Size and Strength Gains

    When Rodents Squat, We Can Learn A Lot!

    Farmer's Walk or Squat? Is Strong- men T. For You?

    Full ROM ➯ Full Gains - Form Counts!

    Cut the Weight, Add the Vibe - Vibration Plates

    Up Your Squat by 25% With Sodium Bicarbonate
    Apropos animal, you don't necessarily have to be a similar "animal" as the 22-year old subjects of the study at hand with their ~8-year training experience to perform the tightly controlled experimental workout, the researchers describe as follows:
    "After BL [baseline] measures, each subject performed a warm-up consisting of 3 minutes of stationary cycling and 2–3 lightto-moderate sets (40–60% of 1RM) of the bench press and squat. Respiratory masks were temporarily removed from each subject during the warm-up to allow subjects to consume water one last time before initiating the protocols.

    Find out how to optimally train your legs - The SuppVersity EMG Series - Gluteus, Quads & Co | read more
    The protocols consisted of performing 5 sets of the bench press and 5 sets of the back squat for up to 10 repetitions using 75% of their predetermined 1RM. The BP group performed the bench press first, whereas the S group performed the back squat first. For all exercises, resistance remained constant while total numbers of repetitions were recorded. Heart rate and oxygen consumption data were collected during the entire protocol. In addition, a linear position transducer (Tendo Sports Machines, Trencin, Slovak Republic) was attached to the bar to measure power and velocity during each completed repetition."
    On each of the three occasions the subjects reported to the lap, a different rest interval was used. With 1-, 2-, and 3-minutes of rest in-between sets, the and a standard 2-minute RI was used in between exercises, the study represents more or less what I see trainees do at the gym on a daily basis, as well... ok, the lazy "I just want to be strong"-10-minutes-of-rest-between-sets-fat-ass was not accordingly represented in the study at hand, but let's be honest, how many of the average trainees do actually fall into this category? I mean, if you ask people why they are going to the gym, they will either lie or tell you that they are there to "look better naked".

    "Looking good naked" is a valid training goal, folks - so admit to it!

    For most people sculpting their body may be only one of the reasons, but in the end, it usually comes down to this and "health" or "fitness", when you're getting honest answers from gym users.
    Figure 2: The amount of energy the trainees expended on bench presses and squats was significantly higher with the 1-min rest periods (17% and 36%, for squats; 8% and 18% for bench presses; data based on Ratamess. 2014)
    Against that background, the insight that short rest periods lead to significant increases in energy expenditure is highly relevant (Note: The energy expenditure was calculated by multiplying the total VO2 for the session x 5.05kcal/L). Losing fat is after all number one on the "looking good naked" priority list of most trainees and in spite of the fact that you won't lose any fat without dieting, the 36% higher energy expenditure of the 1min vs. 3min rest time workout could make the difference between ordinary and outstanding fat loss results... in spite of the increase in the respiratory exchange ratio, an indicator of an increased anaerobic contribution to the energy expenditure, by the way!
    And what about building muscle? There is insufficient data to draw a firm conclusion, but based on the few hardly comparable studies we have suggest that shorter rest times in the 1-2 minute realm are also associated with a more pronounced growth stimulus (Willardson. 2006; de Salles. 2009) and have either no or a hardly significant, yet positive effect on muscle growth (Ahtianen. 2005; Willardson. 2008). Resting for more than 2 minutes between sets does therefore make sense only if you are training for strength.
    Short rest times + 6 Simple Rules of Reasonable Weight Loss = Succes!
    Unfortunately, the myth that "burning fat" during exercise was in any way relevant to your weight / fat loss success is as die hard as it is stupid and flawed.

    Especially for the leaner folks out there, "burning fat" is absolutely irrelevant. In fact, the whole HIIT research appears to suggest that short intense, highly glycolytic exercise regimen are more suitable to shed body fat for athletic individuals than arduous multiple-hour workouts in the non-existing (!) "fat burning zone".

    The reason I still recommend LISS as a preferable type of cardio training for the advanced trainee with three to four resistance training sessions per week is that all the "high intensity stuff" (don't neglect your strength workouts!) is going to overtax the sympathetic nervous system. The classic light-intensity steady state (LISS) work, on the other hand, offers a welcome parasympathetic stimulus to balance all the intense explosive training you're doing at the gym.
    Never train to burn fat! I know this article could create the impression that it would be worth going to the gym to "burn fat", but in the end, the main determinant of fat loss is your diet. If the latter ain't in check, all the training is not going to help. So, you better think of your workouts as the tool to control the fat / muscle loss ratio on a diet.
    Bottom line: If "looking good naked" is your goal and "losing fat" among your top priorities, the results of the study at hand clearly support the longstanding wisdom that cutting back on your rest times will give you the edge.

    You got to be careful, though, without cutting back on your energy intake and following the 6-simple rules of reasonable weight loss, you are not going to be very successful. No matter, if you rest for 1, 2, 3 or 20 minutes - diet and exercise, exercise and diet: If you want to look good naked, the two are simply the front and back of a single coin - you cannot separate them.
    References:
    • Ahtianen, Juha P., et al. "Short vs. long rest period between the sets in hypertrophic resistance training: influence on muscle strength, size, and hormonal adaptations in trained men." The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 19.3 (2005): 572-582.
    • de Salles, Belmiro Freitas, et al. "Rest interval between sets in strength training." Sports Medicine 39.9 (2009): 765-777.
    • Ratamess, Nicolas A., et al. "Acute Oxygen Uptake and Resistance Exercise Performance Using Different Rest Interval Lengths: The Influence of Maximal Aerobic Capacity and Exercise Sequence." Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 28.7 (2014):1875–1888.
    • Willardson, Jeffrey M. "A brief review: factors affecting the length of the rest interval between resistance exercise sets." The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 20.4 (2006): 978-984. 
    • Willardson, Jeffrey M., and Lee N. Burkett. "The effect of different rest intervals between sets on volume components and strength gains." The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 22.1 (2008): 146-152.

    Muscle Activation of Chest, Core, Delts & Rotator Cuff When You Bench on Unstable Ground, Calcium Supplementation & Vascular Disease. BMI, BAI , Body Fat & CVD Risk

    This week's SuppVersity figure(s) of the week deal with the leading cause of death in the USA (see paper attached to the guy's big toe ;-).
    After reading yesterday's installment of the Science Round-Up Seconds, you already know that it is unlikely that you are going to die from prostate cancer.... but let's face it - we all are going to die one day, so if your death is not natural and not due to prostate cancer? What's going to the reason? Well, according to the latest CDC data you, my American friends are going to die from heart disease - ok, not you, a devoted follower of physical culturist, but the average American a devoted follower of Dr. Oz and the sedentary way of living, has an 0.2‰ chance of dying from heart disease and following one of the 597,689 victims the Western way of life claimed in 2010 (CDC. 2011)

    Chest presses on an unstable surface - A new staple exercise? Or bogus?

    (McHardy. 2013) -- I am not quite sure about the States, but over here in Germany much of the funky news sh*t like squatting on unstable surfaces, benching with your bag on a bogus... ah, pardon bozo ball etc. have literally disappeared from both, the mainstream fitness magazines and the gyms. Heavy iron, machine based circle training and classic, as well as HIIT cardio are what people do, so that the  twenty-seven healthy male subjects from the McHardy study would probably have attracted much attention, when they performed their isometric chest presses at maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), 75% MVC, and 50% MVC on a stability ball.
    Figure 1: Exercise specific rel. activation patterns for DB chest presses; data expressed relative to to mean (McHard. 2013)
    As it was to be expected the additional task of having to stabilize their trunk and body, lead to a significant reduction in MVC force output of the main, as well as the agonistic muscle groups. The core, on the other hand was trained pretty effectively, especially in the low(er) intensity conditions.

    What's somewhat surprising, yet maybe highly relevant and an important argument that would speak against doing your chest presses on a stability ball, though, is the highly significant activation of the infraspinatus, the "small" muscle, most people tend to forget about until they suffer from their first rotator cuff injury.

    Bottom line: Due to an increased risk of injury and non-specificity of the exercise doing shoulder presses on a stability ball is probably useful only as a low weight additional movement used either to warm up or after a primary move like the classic or decline bench presses (learn more about the best chest exercises, here).

    Calcium supplementation and vascular disease + Tip: Use Super Tracker

    (Dpwning. 2013) --  It is one of those never-ending research stories, the quest for the answer to the (important?) question, whether calcium supplementation increases, decreases or does not influence the risk of cardiovascular disease at all.

    As a student of the SuppVersity, you know that casein can build 3.2kg muscle literally overnight (learn more). But did you know that a single serving of one of the best selling casein proteins will satisfy 50% of your daily calcium needs? No? Well, in that case you probably don't know that that both lactose and certain caseinophosphopeptides greatly improve the bioavailability of calcium in dairy products over that of most other natural ans certainly supplemental sources (Cámara-Martos. 2002).
    The latest and certainly not last chapter in this never-ending story has just been published in the medical journal Obesity. It is a meta-analysis conducted on 13 observational studies and 9 clinical trials pertaining to calcium supplement use and the risk of adverse outcomes such as cardiovascular disease (CVD), myocardial infarction (MI) that concludes:
    "Overall, the benefits of calcium supplementation, including the positive effects on bone health, appear to outweigh the theoretical risk of increased cardiovascular events." (Downing. 2013)
    Considering the fact that at least those of you who consume significant amounts (not "one serving") of preferably green vegetables and dairy on a regular basis are not in need of calcium supplements, I'd suggest you leave worrying about questions like this to people who should better look into the overall quality of their diet instead of resorting to supplements to maintain bone and heart health (yeah, low calcium is bad for the heart).

    Bottom line: Supplementation should not be necessary of someone who has both green vegetables and dairy in his/her diet. I would recommend you register a free account over at the USDA's SuperTracker and simply plug in your food choices for a couple of days to see if you get enough calcium and what other nutrients you may or may not be deficient in. Don't be shy, the registration is free - you don't even have to enter an email address and the USDA data base is the best source for accurate information about the nutrient contents of food you will find... just ignore "your plate" and you are good to go ;-)

    Surprising superiority of the BMI over BAI as a marker of cardiometabolic risk

    Table 1: If you go by the p-values which indicate the statitical significance of the correlations the BMI is even better than DEXA measured body fat percentages; nd. signifies no difference in p-value detected, while BMI and %BF tell you that the respective value is the "better" predictor (Lichtash. 2013)
    (Lichtash. 2013) -- Let's get the most important things straight, first. The study we are looking at, here, was conduced on 698 Mexican subjects from 193 families (299 male and 399 female) which represent a cross section through the population of immigrants and the children of immigrants with average body fat percentages of 38% and 25% for female and male participants respectively. We are thus not talking about the average physical culturist, here.

    Nevertheless, I personally was quite astonished, to read contrary to the BMI which was associated with all but two measured traits (carotid intima-media thickness and fasting glucose in men) of cardiovascular disease risk the body adiposity index (BAI) which has a 85% correlation with DEXA measured body fat index (Bergman. 2011) "lacked association with several variables" (Lichash. 2013).
     
    Now if you come to think about the way the BAI is calculated (formula from wikipedia.com)


    It is yet not really so surprising, after all the fat that's stored on the hip and buttocks has long been shown to be ugly and aesthetically displeasing, but not a major concern, when it comes to its impact on your metabolic health. The BIA will thus overestimate the risk of people who carry a relatively high amount of benign body fat and underestimate the risk of abdominally obese men and women, who often have a very low hip circumference.

    Bottom line: The important message of the study at hand is thus not that the BMI was a better, let alone good measure of cardiovascular disease risk, but rather that the BIA, i.e. the raio of hip circumference to body height is an even worse indicator of cardiovascular disease risk for the average (pretty chubby) American with Mexican ancestors.

    That's it for today...

    ... as far as the official short news are concerned. If you want some additional up-to-date information from the realms of health, exercise, nutrition and supplementation sciences, I suggest you visit any of the following SuppVersity Facebook News
    • Are you inflamed enough to lose fat? "Inflammation Is a True Fat Burner: BSO-Induced Glutathione Depletion Wards off Fat Gains on Hypercaloric Diet" (read more)
      Chronically fatigued? Maybe you are just lacking the HDL to get the cholesterol into the adrenal gland!? | read more
    • Who is to blame for the obesity epidemic? If you ask the public, the obese are primarily to blame | see more
    • Meta-analysis shows: Neither high nor low fat diets have definite beneficial effects on blood lipids | learn more 
    • Further evidence for the involvement of antioxidants in the proliferation of cancer. They are the ones that help the cancer cells to survive | freak out 
    • Want to lose 15% chest & ab fat and 10% of the subcutaneous fat on your thighs? Do some ultra endurance cycling | believe it or not
    and/or come back later to check for the latest updates on Facebook or Sunday's SuppVersity article. Have a nice weekend, everyone!

    References:
    • Bergman RN, Stefanovski D, Buchanan TA, Sumner AE, Reynolds JC, Sebring NG, Xiang AH, Watanabe RM. A better index of body adiposity. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011 May;19(5):1083-9.  
    • Cámara-Martos F, Amaro-López MA. Influence of dietary factors on calcium bioavailability: a brief review. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2002 Oct;89(1):43-52. 
    • Downing L, Islam MA. Influence of calcium supplements on the occurrence of cardiovascular events. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013 Jul 1;70(13):1132-9.
    • Lichtash CT, Cui J, Guo X, Chen YD, Hsueh WA, Rotter JI, Goodarzi MO. Body Adiposity Index versus Body Mass Index and Other Anthropometric Traits as Correlates of Cardiometabolic Risk Factors. PLoS One. 2013 Jun 11;8(6):e65954. 
    • McHardy, RD. An Electromyographical Analysis Of Shoulder And Trunk Muscles During Chest Press On Stable And Unstable Platforms. Thesis submitted to the Texas State University-San Marcos. August. 2013.